Oversecured vs Wazuh: What are the differences?

## Key Differences Between Oversecured and Wazuh

Oversecured and Wazuh are both security solutions, but they differ in several key aspects. 

1. **Architecture**:
Oversecured is a SaaS platform that provides automated security testing for mobile applications, while Wazuh is an open-source security monitoring platform that collects, analyzes, and correlates security data from various sources. 
   
2. **Focus**:
Oversecured primarily focuses on mobile application security testing, offering features like static and dynamic code analysis specifically tailored for mobile development, whereas Wazuh is focused on overall security monitoring, including intrusion detection, log analysis, and compliance management.

3. **Deployment**:
Oversecured provides a cloud-based solution for easy deployment and scalability, while Wazuh offers both cloud and on-premise deployment options, providing flexibility for different organization needs and preferences. 

4. **Pricing Model**:
Oversecured typically operates on a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay for the services they use, while Wazuh is open-source and free to use, with the option to purchase additional support services and features.

5. **Integrations**:
Wazuh has a wide range of integrations with popular security tools and platforms, making it easier to incorporate into existing security ecosystems, whereas Oversecured may have more limited integrations due to its specialized focus on mobile security.

6. **Scalability**:
Wazuh is known for its scalability, being able to handle large volumes of security data and events, making it suitable for enterprise-level deployments, while Oversecured may have limitations in handling massive amounts of data due to its more targeted approach towards mobile security testing.

In Summary, Oversecured and Wazuh differ in architecture, focus, deployment options, pricing models, integrations, and scalability capabilities.