Pelican vs React-Static

Overview

Pelican

Stacks89

Followers113

Votes28

GitHub Stars13.1K

Forks1.8K

React-Static

Stacks46

Followers114

Votes3

Pelican vs React-Static: What are the differences?

Introduction

Pelican and React-Static are both static site generators, but they have key differences that influence the choice between them.

Template Engine: Pelican uses Jinja2 templating engine, allowing for more flexibility and customization in designing the layout of the site. React-Static, on the other hand, uses React components to manage the UI, providing a more dynamic and interactive experience for users.
JavaScript Framework: Pelican is primarily built with Python, while React-Static is based on JavaScript technology, specifically React. This influences the development environment, dependencies, and overall ecosystem of each static site generator.
Deployment Options: Pelican generates static HTML files that can be easily deployed on any web server, while React-Static offers more advanced deployment options like server-side rendering and incremental builds, particularly useful for larger and more complex websites.
Plugin Ecosystem: Pelican has a robust plugin ecosystem that provides various functionalities and features to extend the core functionality of the static site generator. React-Static, though it has fewer plugins available, offers a more streamlined and integrated development experience out of the box.
Development Speed: React-Static's hot module reloading feature speeds up development by automatically refreshing the page when changes are made, providing a quicker feedback loop for developers compared to Pelican's conventional static file generation process.
Dynamic Content: While both Pelican and React-Static can handle dynamic content using APIs and server-side rendering, React-Static has built-in support for dynamic routes, making it easier to manage and render dynamic content on the site without extensive configurations.

In Summary, Pelican and React-Static differ in template engines, JavaScript frameworks, deployment options, plugin ecosystems, development speed, and handling of dynamic content.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Pelican	React-Static
Pelican is a static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Write your weblog entries directly with your editor of choice (vim!) in reStructuredText or Markdown.	React-Static is a next-gen static site generator for React. Finally, you can build a website like you do any other React App. There's no special CMS, query language, or crazy lifecycle hooks. Just good old React producing an amazing SEO-ready, user experience driven, progressively enhanced website. The effort is minimal, but the benefits are not!
Blog articles and pages;Comments, via an external service (Disqus). (Please note that while useful, Disqus is an external service, and thus the comment data will be somewhat outside of your control and potentially subject to data loss.);Theming support (themes are created using Jinja2 templates);PDF generation of the articles/pages (optional);Publication of articles in multiple languages;Atom/RSS feeds;Code syntax highlighting;Import from WordPress, Dotclear, or RSS feeds;Integration with external tools: Twitter, Google Analytics, etc. (optional);Fast rebuild times thanks to content caching and selective output writing.	React. Enough said;Blazing fast performance;Data Agnostic. Feed your site data from anywhere, however you want;Built for SEO, by SEO professionals;React-first developer experience;Painless project setup & migration;Supports 99.9% of the React ecosystem. Including CSS-in-JS libraries, custom Query layers like GraphQL, and even Redux!;Aggressive and flexible reloading
Statistics
GitHub Stars 13.1K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.8K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 89	Stacks 46
Followers 113	Followers 114
Votes 28	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
Pros 7 Open source 6 Jinja2 4 Implemented in Python 4 Easy to deploy 3 Plugability	Pros 2 GraphQL 1 All the benefits of a static website + React+GraphQL Cons 1 GraphQL
Integrations
Markdown	React

What are some alternatives to Pelican, React-Static?

Jekyll

Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.

Hugo

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

Gatsby

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

Hexo

Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

Middleman

Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

Gridsome

Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again.

DocPad

Empower your website frontends with layouts, meta-data, pre-processors (markdown, jade, coffeescript, etc.), partials, skeletons, file watching, querying, and an amazing plugin system. DocPad will streamline your web development process allowing you to craft full-featured websites quicker than ever before.

Metalsmith

In Metalsmith, all of the logic is handled by plugins. You simply chain them together. Since everything is a plugin, the core library is actually just an abstraction for manipulating a directory of files.

11ty

A simpler static site generator. An alternative to Jekyll. Written in JavaScript. Transforms a directory of templates (of varying types) into HTML. Works with HTML, Markdown, Liquid, Nunjucks, Handlebars, Mustache, EJS, Haml, Pug, and JavaScript Template Literals.

MkDocs

It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

Related Comparisons

Postman vs Swagger UI

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope

Pelican vs React-Static: What are the differences?

Introduction

Pelican and React-Static are both static site generators, but they have key differences that influence the choice between them.

Template Engine: Pelican uses Jinja2 templating engine, allowing for more flexibility and customization in designing the layout of the site. React-Static, on the other hand, uses React components to manage the UI, providing a more dynamic and interactive experience for users.
JavaScript Framework: Pelican is primarily built with Python, while React-Static is based on JavaScript technology, specifically React. This influences the development environment, dependencies, and overall ecosystem of each static site generator.
Deployment Options: Pelican generates static HTML files that can be easily deployed on any web server, while React-Static offers more advanced deployment options like server-side rendering and incremental builds, particularly useful for larger and more complex websites.
Plugin Ecosystem: Pelican has a robust plugin ecosystem that provides various functionalities and features to extend the core functionality of the static site generator. React-Static, though it has fewer plugins available, offers a more streamlined and integrated development experience out of the box.
Development Speed: React-Static's hot module reloading feature speeds up development by automatically refreshing the page when changes are made, providing a quicker feedback loop for developers compared to Pelican's conventional static file generation process.
Dynamic Content: While both Pelican and React-Static can handle dynamic content using APIs and server-side rendering, React-Static has built-in support for dynamic routes, making it easier to manage and render dynamic content on the site without extensive configurations.

In Summary, Pelican and React-Static differ in template engines, JavaScript frameworks, deployment options, plugin ecosystems, development speed, and handling of dynamic content.