StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Security
  4. Security
  5. Wazuh vs pfSense

Wazuh vs pfSense

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

pfSense
pfSense
Stacks109
Followers95
Votes0
Wazuh
Wazuh
Stacks143
Followers336
Votes4
GitHub Stars13.8K
Forks2.0K

Wazuh vs pfSense: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between Wazuh and pfSense, two widely used technologies in the field of cybersecurity. Wazuh is an open-source security platform that helps organizations monitor and protect their infrastructure from potential threats, while pfSense is a free and open-source firewall and routing software based on the FreeBSD operating system. Despite having some overlapping features, they serve different purposes and offer distinct functionalities.

  1. Architecture: Wazuh is designed as a host-based intrusion detection system (HIDS) that operates at the endpoint level, providing detailed visibility and monitoring of individual systems. On the other hand, pfSense is a network-based firewall solution that operates at the network gateway, allowing for the control and protection of the entire network infrastructure.

  2. Security Focus: Wazuh primarily focuses on intrusion detection and incident response capabilities, monitoring log data, file integrity, and system activity to identify potential security incidents. It includes features like log analysis, vulnerability detection, and active response mechanisms. In contrast, pfSense primarily focuses on network security and offers capabilities such as packet filtering, NAT (Network Address Translation), VPN (Virtual Private Network), and traffic shaping.

  3. User Interface: Wazuh offers a web-based management interface called the Wazuh app, which allows users to visualize security events, manage rules, and perform various administrative tasks. It provides a user-friendly dashboard with detailed reports and real-time monitoring capabilities. On the other hand, pfSense offers a comprehensive web-based interface for configuring and managing firewall rules, VPN connections, and other network-related settings. It also provides graphical reporting and monitoring capabilities.

  4. Community Support: Both Wazuh and pfSense have active communities that contribute to their development and provide support. Wazuh benefits from the broader open-source community and its integration with other widely used security tools like Elastic Stack, providing a vast array of resources and expertise. Likewise, pfSense has a dedicated community that actively contributes to its development and provides assistance through forums, mailing lists, and documentation.

  5. Scalability and Deployment: Wazuh can be deployed on a single host or scaled to thousands of endpoints, making it suitable for organizations of various sizes. It also supports distributed deployments with centralized management. PfSense, on the other hand, is suitable for deployment as a dedicated firewall appliance or virtual machine and can handle traffic for small to large networks, making it a flexible option for network security.

  6. Licensing and Support: Wazuh is released under the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2, which provides users with the freedom to use, modify, and distribute the software. Support for Wazuh is available through both community forums and professional subscriptions. PfSense, on the other hand, is released under the Apache License 2.0, which also allows for free use, modification, and distribution. Professional support and consulting services are available for pfSense through Netgate, the company behind the pfSense project.

In summary, Wazuh and pfSense differ in their architecture, security focus, user interface, community support, scalability, and licensing. Wazuh is primarily focused on endpoint security with detailed log analysis and incident response mechanisms, while pfSense is a network-based firewall solution that provides comprehensive network security features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

pfSense
pfSense
Wazuh
Wazuh

It is an open source firewall/router computer software distribution based on FreeBSD. It is installed on a physical computer or a virtual machine to make a dedicated firewall/router for a network.

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Stateful Packet Inspection (SPI); GeoIP blocking
Security Analytics; Intrusion Detection; Log Data Analysis; File Integrity Monitoring; Vulnerability Detection; Configuration Assessment; Incident Response; Regulatory Compliance
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
13.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.0K
Stacks
109
Stacks
143
Followers
95
Followers
336
Votes
0
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Open-source
  • 2
    Well documented
Integrations
Squid
Squid
OpenVPN
OpenVPN
OpenLDAP
OpenLDAP
CloudFlare
CloudFlare
WordPress
WordPress
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows
Splunk
Splunk

What are some alternatives to pfSense, Wazuh?

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

ExpeditedSSL

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Clef

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

Detectify

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Authy

Authy

We make the best rated Two-Factor Authentication smartphone app for consumers, a Rest API for developers and a strong authentication platform for the enterprise.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope