StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Phalcon vs Sane Stack

Phalcon vs Sane Stack

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Phalcon
Phalcon
Stacks246
Followers294
Votes354
GitHub Stars10.8K
Forks2.0K
Sane Stack
Sane Stack
Stacks6
Followers20
Votes13

Phalcon vs Sane Stack: What are the differences?

Developers describe Phalcon as "Web framework delivered as a C-extension for PHP". Phalcon is a web framework implemented as a C extension offering high performance and lower resource consumption. On the other hand, Sane Stack is detailed as "Ember on Sails". A full web development stack written in Javascript, integrating Ember.js, Sails.js and Docker.

Phalcon and Sane Stack can be categorized as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.

Phalcon and Sane Stack are both open source tools. It seems that Phalcon with 9.74K GitHub stars and 1.78K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Sane Stack with 479 GitHub stars and 53 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Phalcon
Phalcon
Sane Stack
Sane Stack

Phalcon is a web framework implemented as a C extension offering high performance and lower resource consumption.

A full web development stack written in Javascript, integrating Ember.js, Sails.js and Docker

-
Single-Page Application, Web Server, API, Docker, CLI, Automation, Demo App
Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
246
Stacks
6
Followers
294
Followers
20
Votes
354
Votes
13
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 65
    Fast
  • 54
    High performance
  • 37
    Open source
  • 35
    Fast and easy to use
  • 32
    Scalable
Cons
  • 4
    Support few databases
  • 2
    Very bad documentation
Pros
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Contains big frameworks like Sails and Ember
  • 2
    Building webapplications in a short time
  • 1
    No language context switching for backend & frontend
  • 1
    Works on OS/X, Linux and Windows
Integrations
PHP
PHP
Ember.js
Ember.js
Sails.js
Sails.js
Node.js
Node.js
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Phalcon, Sane Stack?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase