StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Server Interface
  5. PHP-FPM vs uWSGI

PHP-FPM vs uWSGI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

uWSGI
uWSGI
Stacks424
Followers311
Votes12
GitHub Stars3.5K
Forks699
PHP-FPM
PHP-FPM
Stacks121
Followers119
Votes0

PHP-FPM vs uWSGI: What are the differences?

Key Differences between PHP-FPM and uWSGI

PHP-FPM and uWSGI are two popular options for hosting and running PHP applications. While they have some similarities, they also have distinct features that set them apart. Here are the key differences between PHP-FPM and uWSGI:

  1. Architecture: PHP-FPM stands for PHP FastCGI Process Manager, while uWSGI is a full application server. PHP-FPM works as a process manager for PHP applications running on a web server, while uWSGI is a flexible application container that supports multiple languages, including Python, Ruby, and Perl.

  2. Scalability: PHP-FPM lacks native support for horizontal scaling, meaning it can only handle a limited number of concurrent requests. On the other hand, uWSGI is designed for high concurrency and can handle a large number of simultaneous connections, making it more scalable and suitable for high-traffic websites. uWSGI also offers advanced load-balancing capabilities.

  3. Configuration: PHP-FPM uses a simple and straightforward configuration file format, making it easier to set up and configure. uWSGI, on the other hand, has a more complex configuration system with extensive options and plugins, allowing for more advanced customization and fine-tuning.

  4. Compatibility: PHP-FPM is specifically designed for running PHP applications and works seamlessly with popular web servers like Nginx and Apache. uWSGI, on the other hand, is a more versatile application server that supports multiple languages and can be integrated with various web servers, reverse proxies, and load balancers, providing more flexibility and compatibility options.

  5. Performance: PHP-FPM has a smaller memory footprint and lower latency compared to uWSGI. However, uWSGI offers better performance and throughput for highly concurrent workloads. Its advanced features like async I/O, thread support, and advanced process management allow it to handle a large number of connections efficiently.

  6. Community and support: PHP-FPM has a larger and more established community and is widely used in the PHP ecosystem. It has extensive documentation and a large number of resources and tutorials available for troubleshooting and support. uWSGI also has a dedicated community and support channels but may have a relatively smaller user base compared to PHP-FPM.

In summary, PHP-FPM is a lightweight and simple process manager specifically designed for running PHP applications, while uWSGI is a more versatile and feature-rich application server capable of running applications in multiple languages. PHP-FPM is easier to configure and has better compatibility, while uWSGI offers better scalability, performance, and flexibility. The choice between PHP-FPM and uWSGI depends on the specific needs and requirements of the application.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

uWSGI
uWSGI
PHP-FPM
PHP-FPM

The uWSGI project aims at developing a full stack for building hosting services.

It is an alternative PHP FastCGI implementation with some additional features useful for sites of any size, especially busier sites. It includes Adaptive process spawning, Advanced process management with graceful stop/start, Emergency restart in case of accidental opcode cache destruction etc.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
699
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
424
Stacks
121
Followers
311
Followers
119
Votes
12
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Faster
  • 4
    Simple
  • 2
    Powerful
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Python
Python
Perl
Perl
Ruby
Ruby
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to uWSGI, PHP-FPM?

Sidekiq

Sidekiq

Sidekiq uses threads to handle many jobs at the same time in the same process. It does not require Rails but will integrate tightly with Rails 3/4 to make background processing dead simple.

Beanstalkd

Beanstalkd

Beanstalks's interface is generic, but was originally designed for reducing the latency of page views in high-volume web applications by running time-consuming tasks asynchronously.

Hangfire

Hangfire

It is an open-source framework that helps you to create, process and manage your background jobs, i.e. operations you don't want to put in your request processing pipeline. It supports all kind of background tasks – short-running and long-running, CPU intensive and I/O intensive, one shot and recurrent.

Resque

Resque

Background jobs can be any Ruby class or module that responds to perform. Your existing classes can easily be converted to background jobs or you can create new classes specifically to do work. Or, you can do both.

Waitress

Waitress

It is meant to be a production-quality pure-Python WSGI server with very acceptable performance. It has no dependencies except ones which live in the Python standard library. It runs on CPython on Unix and Windows under Python 2.7+ and Python 3.4+. It is also known to run on PyPy 1.6.0 on UNIX.

delayed_job

delayed_job

Delayed_job (or DJ) encapsulates the common pattern of asynchronously executing longer tasks in the background. It is a direct extraction from Shopify where the job table is responsible for a multitude of core tasks.

Faktory

Faktory

Redis -> Sidekiq == Faktory -> Faktory. Faktory is a server daemon which provides a simple API to produce and consume background jobs. Jobs are a small JSON hash with a few mandatory keys.

Kue

Kue

Kue is a feature rich priority job queue for node.js backed by redis. A key feature of Kue is its clean user-interface for viewing and managing queued, active, failed, and completed jobs.

Bull

Bull

The fastest, most reliable, Redis-based queue for Node. Carefully written for rock solid stability and atomicity.

Owin

Owin

It is a standard for an interface between .NET Web applications and Web servers. It is a community-owned open-source project.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase