StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. PHP-MVC vs ReactiveUI

PHP-MVC vs ReactiveUI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC
Stacks106
Followers222
Votes3
ReactiveUI
ReactiveUI
Stacks10
Followers10
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.4K
Forks1.1K

PHP-MVC vs ReactiveUI: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between PHP-MVC and ReactiveUI.

1. **Architecture**: PHP-MVC follows the Model View Controller architecture, separating the application into three interconnected components. ReactiveUI, on the other hand, is based on the Model-View-ViewModel (MVVM) pattern, which focuses on unidirectional data flow and reactive programming.
2. **Language**: PHP is a server-side scripting language commonly used for web development, while ReactiveUI primarily works with C# and other .NET languages, emphasizing functional and reactive programming paradigms.
3. **State management**: PHP-MVC relies on traditional state management methods like sessions and cookies, while ReactiveUI utilizes reactive programming techniques to manage state changes and data flow, leading to more responsive user interfaces and smoother application behavior.
4. **Event handling**: In PHP-MVC, event handling is typically done through server-side scripts and page reloads, whereas ReactiveUI uses event streams and observables to handle user interactions and data changes in a more reactive and efficient manner.
5. **Testing**: PHP-MVC applications are often tested with various PHP testing frameworks like PHPUnit, while ReactiveUI offers built-in testing support with tools like ReactiveCommand to easily test reactive UI interactions and behaviors.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between PHP-MVC and ReactiveUI can help developers choose the right approach for their specific project requirements. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PHP-MVC
PHP-MVC
ReactiveUI
ReactiveUI

This project is - by intention - NOT a full framework, it's a bare-bone structure, written in purely native PHP ! The php-mvc skeleton tries to be the extremely slimmed down opposite of big frameworks like Zend2, Symfony or Laravel.

It is an advanced, composable, functional reactive model-view-viewmodel framework for all .NET platforms that is inspired by functional reactive programming. It allows you to abstract mutable state away from your user interfaces, express the idea around a feature in one readable place and improve the testability of your application.

-
Declarative; Composable; Cross-platform; Scalable & Testable; Open-source
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
106
Stacks
10
Followers
222
Followers
10
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to Learn
No community feedback yet
Integrations
PHP
PHP
.NET
.NET

What are some alternatives to PHP-MVC, ReactiveUI?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase