Ping Identity vs PingOne

Overview

Ping Identity

Stacks18

Followers75

Votes37

PingOne

Stacks8

Followers18

Votes0

Ping Identity vs PingOne: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Ping Identity and PingOne are two different identity and access management (IAM) solutions offered by Ping Identity Corporation. While both solutions aim to provide secure and convenient authentication and authorization services, there are several key differences between them.

Deployment Model: The first key difference between Ping Identity and PingOne lies in their deployment models. Ping Identity is primarily an on-premises IAM solution, which means it is installed and managed within an organization's own infrastructure. On the other hand, PingOne is a cloud-based IAM solution, wherein the infrastructure and management of the solution are handled by Ping Identity in the cloud.
Scalability: Another important distinction between Ping Identity and PingOne is their scalability. Ping Identity offers high scalability and can handle large-scale deployments, making it well-suited for organizations with complex infrastructure and extensive user bases. In contrast, PingOne is more suitable for small to medium-sized businesses with simpler IAM requirements and fewer users.
Customization and Control: Ping Identity provides extensive customization options, allowing organizations to tailor the IAM solution according to their specific needs. This includes the ability to integrate with various third-party applications and systems. On the other hand, PingOne offers a more standardized and streamlined approach, with less flexibility for customization. This simplicity enables easier implementation and management for organizations with less complex requirements.
Complexity vs. Ease of Use: Ping Identity is a comprehensive IAM solution that offers a wide range of features and capabilities, making it highly suitable for organizations with complex identity and access management needs. However, this also means that its implementation and management can be more complex and require dedicated expertise. In contrast, PingOne is designed to be user-friendly and straightforward, with simplified configuration and administration workflows, making it more accessible for organizations with less technical expertise.
Integration Capabilities: Ping Identity has a greater range of integration capabilities compared to PingOne. It offers a vast number of connectors and adapters, allowing organizations to seamlessly integrate the IAM solution with various applications, databases, directories, and other identity systems. PingOne, while it also provides integration options, has a more limited set of pre-built connectors and focuses primarily on key cloud-based applications.
Cost Model: Lastly, the cost models for Ping Identity and PingOne differ. Ping Identity typically involves a perpetual license fee plus ongoing maintenance and support costs, which can be a significant investment for organizations. On the other hand, PingOne operates on a subscription-based model, where organizations pay a monthly or annual fee based on the number of users. This makes PingOne more financially accessible, especially for smaller organizations with limited budgets.

In Summary, Ping Identity and PingOne differ in terms of deployment model, scalability, customization, complexity, integration capabilities, and cost model. These differences allow organizations to choose the IAM solution that best aligns with their specific requirements, infrastructure, and budget.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Ping Identity	PingOne
It provides an identity and access management platform enabling the right people access to the right things seamlessly and securely.	It is a best-in-class Identity-as-a-Service (IDaaS) offering for organizations that prefer a more hands-free approach to identity and access management (IAM) for their customers and workforce.
Authenticate users leveraging any mobile device and contextual mobile data.; Enable secure single sign-on to any application from anywhere on any device.; Authorize access to only the web, mobile and API resources users need.	Rapidly embed identity services; Multi-factor authentication, Self-service ; Easy-to-use, API-first
Statistics
Stacks 18	Stacks 8
Followers 75	Followers 18
Votes 37	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 OIDC 3 IdP 3 SSO 3 SAML 2 OAUTH 2.0	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Ping Identity, PingOne?

bitwarden

bitwarden is the easiest and safest way to store and sync your passwords across all of your devices.

LastPass

LastPass Enterprise offers your employees and admins a single, unified experience that combines the power of SAML SSO coupled with enterprise-class password vaulting. LastPass is your first line of defense in the battle to protect your digital assets from the significant risks associated with employee password re-use and phishing.

Okta

Connect all your apps in days, not months, with instant access to thousands of pre-built integrations - even add apps to the network yourself. Integrations are easy to set up, constantly monitored, proactively repaired and handle authentication and provisioning.

Passbolt

Passbolt is an open source password manager for teams. It allows to securely store and share credentials, and is based on OpenPGP.

KeePass

It is an open source password manager. Passwords can be stored in highly-encrypted databases, which can be unlocked with one master password or key file.

KeePassXC

It is a cross-platform community-driven port of the Windows application “Keepass Password Safe”. It can store your passwords safely and auto-type them into your everyday websites and applications.

1Password

Lock credentials and secrets in vaults that sync across systems and seamlessly access within your dev, CI/CD, and production environments. Plus, generate and use SSH keys directly from 1Password, automate infrastructure secrets, and more.

Dashlane

Dashlane is a password manager and online security app for everyone who lives, works, and plays on the internet.

Password Safe

It is a password database utility. Like many other such products, commercial and otherwise, it stores your passwords in an encrypted file, allowing you to remember only one password (the "safe combination").

Azure Active Directory

It is a comprehensive identity and access management solution that gives you a robust set of capabilities to manage users and groups. You can get the reliability and scalability you need with identity services that work with your on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environment.

Related Comparisons

Ping Identity vs PingOne: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Deployment Model: The first key difference between Ping Identity and PingOne lies in their deployment models. Ping Identity is primarily an on-premises IAM solution, which means it is installed and managed within an organization's own infrastructure. On the other hand, PingOne is a cloud-based IAM solution, wherein the infrastructure and management of the solution are handled by Ping Identity in the cloud.
Scalability: Another important distinction between Ping Identity and PingOne is their scalability. Ping Identity offers high scalability and can handle large-scale deployments, making it well-suited for organizations with complex infrastructure and extensive user bases. In contrast, PingOne is more suitable for small to medium-sized businesses with simpler IAM requirements and fewer users.
Customization and Control: Ping Identity provides extensive customization options, allowing organizations to tailor the IAM solution according to their specific needs. This includes the ability to integrate with various third-party applications and systems. On the other hand, PingOne offers a more standardized and streamlined approach, with less flexibility for customization. This simplicity enables easier implementation and management for organizations with less complex requirements.
Complexity vs. Ease of Use: Ping Identity is a comprehensive IAM solution that offers a wide range of features and capabilities, making it highly suitable for organizations with complex identity and access management needs. However, this also means that its implementation and management can be more complex and require dedicated expertise. In contrast, PingOne is designed to be user-friendly and straightforward, with simplified configuration and administration workflows, making it more accessible for organizations with less technical expertise.
Integration Capabilities: Ping Identity has a greater range of integration capabilities compared to PingOne. It offers a vast number of connectors and adapters, allowing organizations to seamlessly integrate the IAM solution with various applications, databases, directories, and other identity systems. PingOne, while it also provides integration options, has a more limited set of pre-built connectors and focuses primarily on key cloud-based applications.
Cost Model: Lastly, the cost models for Ping Identity and PingOne differ. Ping Identity typically involves a perpetual license fee plus ongoing maintenance and support costs, which can be a significant investment for organizations. On the other hand, PingOne operates on a subscription-based model, where organizations pay a monthly or annual fee based on the number of users. This makes PingOne more financially accessible, especially for smaller organizations with limited budgets.

Ping Identity vs PingOne

Overview