Ping Identity vs PingOne: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Ping Identity and PingOne are two different identity and access management (IAM) solutions offered by Ping Identity Corporation. While both solutions aim to provide secure and convenient authentication and authorization services, there are several key differences between them.

1. Deployment Model: The first key difference between Ping Identity and PingOne lies in their deployment models. Ping Identity is primarily an on-premises IAM solution, which means it is installed and managed within an organization's own infrastructure. On the other hand, PingOne is a cloud-based IAM solution, wherein the infrastructure and management of the solution are handled by Ping Identity in the cloud.

2. Scalability: Another important distinction between Ping Identity and PingOne is their scalability. Ping Identity offers high scalability and can handle large-scale deployments, making it well-suited for organizations with complex infrastructure and extensive user bases. In contrast, PingOne is more suitable for small to medium-sized businesses with simpler IAM requirements and fewer users.

3. Customization and Control: Ping Identity provides extensive customization options, allowing organizations to tailor the IAM solution according to their specific needs. This includes the ability to integrate with various third-party applications and systems. On the other hand, PingOne offers a more standardized and streamlined approach, with less flexibility for customization. This simplicity enables easier implementation and management for organizations with less complex requirements.

4. Complexity vs. Ease of Use: Ping Identity is a comprehensive IAM solution that offers a wide range of features and capabilities, making it highly suitable for organizations with complex identity and access management needs. However, this also means that its implementation and management can be more complex and require dedicated expertise. In contrast, PingOne is designed to be user-friendly and straightforward, with simplified configuration and administration workflows, making it more accessible for organizations with less technical expertise.

5. Integration Capabilities: Ping Identity has a greater range of integration capabilities compared to PingOne. It offers a vast number of connectors and adapters, allowing organizations to seamlessly integrate the IAM solution with various applications, databases, directories, and other identity systems. PingOne, while it also provides integration options, has a more limited set of pre-built connectors and focuses primarily on key cloud-based applications.

6. Cost Model: Lastly, the cost models for Ping Identity and PingOne differ. Ping Identity typically involves a perpetual license fee plus ongoing maintenance and support costs, which can be a significant investment for organizations. On the other hand, PingOne operates on a subscription-based model, where organizations pay a monthly or annual fee based on the number of users. This makes PingOne more financially accessible, especially for smaller organizations with limited budgets.

In Summary, Ping Identity and PingOne differ in terms of deployment model, scalability, customization, complexity, integration capabilities, and cost model. These differences allow organizations to choose the IAM solution that best aligns with their specific requirements, infrastructure, and budget.