Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Pow
Pow

5
6
+ 1
0
Puma
Puma

265
153
+ 1
16
Add tool

Pow vs Puma: What are the differences?

What is Pow? Zero-configuration Rack server for Mac OS X. Pow is a zero-configuration Rack server for Mac OS X. It makes developing Rails and Rack applications as frictionless as possible. You can install it in ten seconds and have your first app up and running in under a minute. No mucking around with /etc/hosts, no compiling Apache modules, no editing configuration files or installing preference panes. And running multiple apps with multiple versions of Ruby is trivial.

What is Puma? A Modern, Concurrent Web Server for Ruby. Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Pow and Puma can be categorized as "Web Servers" tools.

Pow and Puma are both open source tools. It seems that Puma with 5.73K GitHub stars and 974 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Pow with 3.47K GitHub stars and 258 GitHub forks.

What is Pow?

Pow is a zero-configuration Rack server for Mac OS X. It makes developing Rails and Rack applications as frictionless as possible. You can install it in ten seconds and have your first app up and running in under a minute. No mucking around with /etc/hosts, no compiling Apache modules, no editing configuration files or installing preference panes. And running multiple apps with multiple versions of Ruby is trivial.

What is Puma?

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Pow?
Why do developers choose Puma?
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

      Be the first to leave a con
      What companies use Pow?
      What companies use Puma?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Pow?
      What tools integrate with Puma?
        No integrations found
        What are some alternatives to Pow and Puma?
        nginx
        nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.
        Apache HTTP Server
        The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.
        Microsoft IIS
        Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.
        Apache Tomcat
        Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.
        OpenResty
        OpenResty (aka. ngx_openresty) is a full-fledged web application server by bundling the standard Nginx core, lots of 3rd-party Nginx modules, as well as most of their external dependencies.
        See all alternatives
        Decisions about Pow and Puma
        Jerome Dalbert
        Jerome Dalbert
        Senior Backend Engineer at StackShare | 6 upvotes 148.2K views
        atStackShareStackShare
        Unicorn
        Unicorn
        Puma
        Puma
        Rails
        Rails

        We switched from Unicorn (process model) to Puma (threaded model) to decrease the memory footprint of our Rails production web server. Memory indeed dropped from 6GB to only 1GB!

        We just had to decrease our worker count and increase our thread count instead. Performance (response time and throughput) remained the same, if not slightly better. We had no thread-safety errors, which was good.

        Free bonus points are:

        • Requests are blazing fast on our dev and staging environments!
        • Puma has first-class support for WebSockets, so we know for sure that Rails ActionCable or GraphQL subscriptions will work great.
        • Being on Puma makes us even more "default Rails"-compliant since it is the default Rails web server these days.
        See more
        Interest over time
        Reviews of Pow and Puma
        No reviews found
        How developers use Pow and Puma
        Avatar of Karma
        Karma uses PowPow

        Pow is what we use for development on our local machines. It's easy to setup, and easy to maintain since it also eliminates the need for maintaining a /etc/hosts file.

        Avatar of Oded Arbel
        Oded Arbel uses PumaPuma

        Server for Rails-powered API

        Avatar of Satoru Ishikawa
        Satoru Ishikawa uses PumaPuma

        Heroku 銇у嫊銇嬨仚Web銈点兗銉愩兗

        Avatar of Jamie Yun
        Jamie Yun uses PumaPuma

        expert

        How much does Pow cost?
        How much does Puma cost?
        Pricing unavailable
        Pricing unavailable
        News about Pow
        More news