StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. PrimeFaces vs PrimeNg

PrimeFaces vs PrimeNg

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PrimeFaces
PrimeFaces
Stacks111
Followers190
Votes4
PrimeNg
PrimeNg
Stacks229
Followers286
Votes15
GitHub Stars12.1K
Forks5.0K

PrimeFaces vs PrimeNg: What are the differences?

PrimeFaces vs PrimeNG

PrimeFaces and PrimeNG are popular UI component libraries for building web applications using Java and Angular, respectively. While both provide a wide range of UI components and functionality, they have some key differences that set them apart.

  1. Technology: PrimeFaces is based on JavaServer Faces (JSF), a Java-based web application framework, while PrimeNG is based on Angular, a popular JavaScript framework for building web applications. This difference in technology means that PrimeFaces is better suited for Java-based web applications, while PrimeNG is more suitable for Angular-based applications.

  2. Community Support: PrimeFaces has been around for a longer time and has a larger community of users and developers. This means that there is a wealth of resources and support available for PrimeFaces, including a dedicated forum and active community members. In contrast, PrimeNG is relatively newer and has a smaller community, which may result in less support and resources.

  3. Component Set: PrimeFaces and PrimeNG have different sets of UI components. PrimeFaces offers a comprehensive set of more than 100 ready-to-use components, including data tables, charts, dialogs, and menus. PrimeNG also provides a wide range of UI components, but the set is not as extensive as PrimeFaces. The specific components available in each library may also differ, so developers should consider their requirements when choosing between the two.

  4. Styling and Theming: PrimeFaces and PrimeNG come with their own styling and theming options. PrimeFaces uses the jQuery UI framework for styling its components, which provides a consistent and familiar look and feel. On the other hand, PrimeNG uses its own styling and theming options, which are based on the Material Design guidelines. This means that PrimeNG offers a more modern and visually appealing design, but it may require more customization to match the overall look and feel of the application.

  5. Integration with Frameworks: PrimeFaces is closely integrated with JSF and provides seamless integration with other Java technologies, such as EJB and CDI. It also offers support for popular IDEs like Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA. PrimeNG, being an Angular-based library, integrates well with the Angular ecosystem and takes full advantage of Angular's features, such as dependency injection and reactive programming. This makes PrimeNG a preferred choice for developers who are already using Angular or want to leverage its capabilities.

  6. License: Another difference between PrimeFaces and PrimeNG is their licensing. PrimeFaces is licensed under the Apache License, which allows for free and open-source use in both commercial and non-commercial projects. PrimeNG, on the other hand, has a dual licensing model - it offers a free open-source version under the MIT license, and a commercial version with additional features and support. This difference in licensing may be a factor to consider when choosing between the two libraries.

In Summary, PrimeFaces and PrimeNG are UI component libraries with different technology stacks, community support, component sets, styling options, integration with frameworks, and licensing. Developers should evaluate their specific requirements and preferences to decide which library is best suited for their project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PrimeFaces
PrimeFaces
PrimeNg
PrimeNg

It is a popular open source framework for JavaServer Faces featuring over 100 components, touch optimized mobilekit, client side validation, theme engine and more.

It has a rich collection of components that would satisfy most of the UI requirements of your application like datatable, dropdown, multiselect, notification messages, accordion, breadcrumbs and other input components. So there would be no need of adding different libraries for different UI requirements.

Touch optimized; Client side validation
Single library for all components; supports templating; Active development; offers a list of themes for UI components
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
12.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.0K
Stacks
111
Stacks
229
Followers
190
Followers
286
Votes
4
Votes
15
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    JEE Integration
  • 1
    Support Contract available
  • 1
    Nice Components
Cons
  • 1
    Some components have to be bought
  • 1
    JSF
Pros
  • 6
    Complete
  • 4
    Wide range of components
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Already 17+ version up
  • 1
    Modern UI components that work across the web
Cons
  • 4
    Components are hard to customize
  • 3
    Need to buy themes
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 2
    No documentation
  • 2
    Hard to understand
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Angular
Angular
Angular CLI
Angular CLI

What are some alternatives to PrimeFaces, PrimeNg?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase