StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Prototype vs Yoga

Prototype vs Yoga

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Prototype
Prototype
Stacks2.4K
Followers31
Votes0
Yoga
Yoga
Stacks77
Followers45
Votes5
GitHub Stars18.4K
Forks1.5K

Prototype vs Yoga: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Prototype and Yoga, there are key differences that set them apart in terms of their functionality and usage.

  1. Architecture: Prototype is a JavaScript framework that focuses on simplifying the process of writing code by extending built-in JavaScript objects. On the other hand, Yoga is a layout engine that is specifically designed to work with React Native for building user interfaces. While Prototype enhances the capabilities of JavaScript, Yoga focuses on optimizing layouts for mobile app development.

  2. Purpose: Prototype is primarily used for adding additional functionality and features to JavaScript, making it easier to work with objects, arrays, and other data structures. Meanwhile, Yoga is used for handling the layout of elements in a React Native application, ensuring that components are rendered correctly on different devices and screen sizes.

  3. Community Support: Prototype has been around for a longer time and has a larger community of developers who contribute to its development and maintenance. Yoga, being more specialized, has a smaller but dedicated community focused on improving its capabilities for layout design in React Native projects.

  4. Dependencies: Prototype can be used independently in any JavaScript project without any external dependencies. However, Yoga is specifically tailored for use with React Native and relies on the React Native framework for its functionality, making it a necessary component for building responsive layouts in React Native apps.

  5. Performance: Prototype may impact the performance of a JavaScript application due to its extensive modifications to the native objects. In contrast, Yoga is optimized for performance in rendering layouts efficiently in React Native, ensuring fast and responsive user interfaces without compromising speed or functionality.

  6. Documentation and Learning Curve: Prototype has extensive documentation and resources available due to its long history and widespread usage, making it easier for developers to learn and implement. Yoga, being more specialized, may have a steeper learning curve for beginners, requiring familiarity with React Native and its layout principles.

In Summary, Prototype and Yoga differ in architecture, purpose, community support, dependencies, performance impact, and the learning curve required for developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Prototype
Prototype
Yoga
Yoga

Prototype is a JavaScript framework that aims to ease development of dynamic web applications. It offers a familiar class-style OO framework, extensive Ajax support, higher-order programming constructs, and easy DOM manipulation.

Yoga is a cross-platform layout engine which implements Flexbox. Yoga enables maximum collaboration within your team by implementing an API familiar to many designers and opening it up to developers across different platforms.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
18.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
2.4K
Stacks
77
Followers
31
Followers
45
Votes
0
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 5
    Jhgjhgjhgjgjhghjg
  • 0
    5wyrtbagbnargnargnargn
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Prototype, Yoga?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase