StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtualization Platform
  5. Proxmox VE vs VMware vSAN

Proxmox VE vs VMware vSAN

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Proxmox VE
Proxmox VE
Stacks352
Followers334
Votes41
VMware vSAN
VMware vSAN
Stacks16
Followers12
Votes0

Proxmox VE vs VMware vSAN: What are the differences?

Key differences between Proxmox VE and VMware vSAN

  1. Scalability and Integration: Proxmox VE is an open-source virtualization platform that offers scalability by supporting both containers (LXC) and virtual machines (KVM). It also integrates well with various storage systems, including Ceph and ZFS. On the other hand, VMware vSAN is a software-defined storage solution that is tightly integrated with the VMware vSphere hypervisor, providing a seamless storage experience within the VMware ecosystem.

  2. Storage Architecture: Proxmox VE uses a distributed storage architecture, which means that each node in the cluster contributes storage resources to create a shared storage pool. This allows for high availability and seamless live migration of virtual machines. In contrast, VMware vSAN uses a hyper-converged storage architecture, where each node in the vSAN cluster also contributes storage capacity, but this storage is dedicated exclusively to vSAN.

  3. Management Interface: Proxmox VE offers a web-based management interface that is intuitive and easy to use. This interface provides a unified view of all virtual machines, containers, and storage resources in the cluster, allowing for efficient management and administration. In comparison, VMware vSAN is managed through the vSphere Web Client, which provides comprehensive control over virtual machines, storage policies, and vSAN-specific settings.

  4. Licensing and Cost: Proxmox VE is an open-source solution and is available free of charge, with optional paid support subscriptions for enterprise users. This makes it a cost-effective choice for organizations with budget constraints or those who prefer open-source solutions. On the other hand, VMware vSAN requires a separate license, which adds to the overall cost of deploying a VMware infrastructure.

  5. Ecosystem and Vendor Support: Proxmox VE has a growing community and an active user base, with community forums and online resources available for support and troubleshooting. It also has a marketplace where users can find and share preconfigured virtual appliances. VMware vSAN, being a product of VMware, benefits from a robust ecosystem and extensive vendor support, with access to VMware documentation, training, and professional services.

In summary, Proxmox VE provides an open-source, scalable, and cost-effective virtualization platform that integrates well with various storage systems, while VMware vSAN offers a tightly integrated, hyper-converged storage solution with comprehensive management capabilities within the VMware ecosystem, backed by extensive vendor support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Proxmox VE
Proxmox VE
VMware vSAN
VMware vSAN

It is a complete open-source platform for all-inclusive enterprise virtualization that tightly integrates KVM hypervisor and LXC containers, software-defined storage and networking functionality on a single platform, and easily manages high availability clusters and disaster recovery tools with the built-in web management interface.

It is enterprise-class, storage virtualization software that, when combined with vSphere, allows you to manage compute and storage with a single platform. You can reduce the cost and complexity of traditional storage and take the easiest path to hyperconverged infrastructure and hybrid cloud. Evolve to an integrated hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) solution with vSAN to improve business agility, all while speeding operations and lowering costs.

-
Integrated with Your Hypervisor; Lower Costs; Power Traditional and Cloud-Native Applications; Private Cloud and Hybrid Cloud Ready
Statistics
Stacks
352
Stacks
16
Followers
334
Followers
12
Votes
41
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    HA VM & LXC devices
  • 8
    Ease of use
  • 7
    Robust architecture
  • 6
    Free
  • 6
    Avoid vendor lock-in
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Aliyun
Aliyun

What are some alternatives to Proxmox VE, VMware vSAN?

VirtualBox

VirtualBox

VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.

VMware vSphere

VMware vSphere

vSphere is the world’s leading server virtualization platform. Run fewer servers and reduce capital and operating costs using VMware vSphere to build a cloud computing infrastructure.

KVM

KVM

KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V).

Qemu

Qemu

When used as a machine emulator, it can run OSes and programs made for one machine (e.g. an ARM board) on a different machine (e.g. your own PC). By using dynamic translation, it achieves very good performance. When used as a virtualizer, it achieves near native performance by executing the guest code directly on the host CPU. it supports virtualization when executing under the Xen hypervisor or using the KVM kernel module in Linux. When using KVM, it can virtualize x86, server and embedded PowerPC, 64-bit POWER, S390, 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, and MIPS guests.

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop for Mac allows you to seamlessly run both Windows and MacOS applications side-by-side with speed, control and confidence.

Parallels

Parallels

It is an application and desktop virtualization software vendor that offers management and delivery platforms for Apple macOS and Microsoft Windows desktop deployments.

VMware Fusion

VMware Fusion

It gives Mac users the power to run Windows on Mac along with hundreds of other operating systems side by side with Mac applications, without rebooting. It is simple enough for home users and powerful enough for IT professionals, developers and businesses.

Xen

Xen

It is a hypervisor using a microkernel design, providing services that allow multiple computer operating systems to execute on the same computer hardware concurrently. It was developed by the Linux Foundation and is supported by Intel.

Oracle VM Server

Oracle VM Server

It is a zero license cost server virtualization and management solution that makes enterprise applications easier to deploy, manage, and support. Backed worldwide by affordable enterprise-quality support for both Oracle and non-Oracle environments, it reduces operations and support costs while increasing IT efficiency and agility.

Virtuozzo

Virtuozzo

It is an operating system-level server virtualization solution designed to centralize server management and consolidate workloads, which reduces overhead by reducing the number of physical servers required. Organizations use it for server consolidation, disaster recovery, and server workload agility.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana