Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
PRTG vs Wireshark: What are the differences?
Key Differences between PRTG and Wireshark
PRTG (Paessler Router Traffic Grapher) and Wireshark are both popular network monitoring tools with different functionalities. The key differences between PRTG and Wireshark are as follows:
Features: PRTG is a comprehensive network monitoring tool that offers a wide range of features such as bandwidth monitoring, device monitoring, application monitoring, and server monitoring. It is designed to provide real-time monitoring and alerting for network administrators. On the other hand, Wireshark is primarily a network protocol analyzer that captures and analyzes network traffic, allowing users to inspect packets and troubleshoot network issues.
User Interface: PRTG provides a user-friendly and intuitive web-based interface that allows users to easily set up and configure monitoring sensors. It offers customizable dashboards and reports for monitoring network performance. In contrast, Wireshark has a more technical and complex user interface that requires a certain level of expertise to effectively use and interpret the captured network packets.
Deployment: PRTG is a commercial solution that requires installation on a dedicated server or PC, and it supports both on-premises and cloud deployment. It can be accessed via a web browser from any device connected to the network. On the other hand, Wireshark is an open-source tool that can be installed on various operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. It can be deployed on individual machines without the need for a dedicated server.
Scope: PRTG focuses on monitoring the overall network infrastructure, including devices, applications, and servers. It provides comprehensive visibility into the network, enabling proactive monitoring and troubleshooting. In contrast, Wireshark focuses more on capturing and analyzing network packets. It allows users to inspect individual packets, decode protocols, and analyze network traffic at a granular level.
Data Collection: PRTG collects data by monitoring SNMP-enabled devices, using WMI or Windows performance counters, and utilizing various protocols such as NetFlow, sFlow, and Packet Sniffing. It provides real-time data collection and alerting for proactive network management. Wireshark, on the other hand, captures packets by sniffing network traffic on a specific interface or by analyzing packet capture files. It provides detailed packet-level information for troubleshooting and analysis purposes.
Use Cases: PRTG is widely used in enterprise environments to monitor network performance, ensure network availability, and manage bandwidth usage. It is suitable for IT teams responsible for network administration, system monitoring, and capacity planning. Wireshark, on the other hand, is primarily used by network engineers and security professionals for network troubleshooting, protocol analysis, and network forensics.
In summary, PRTG is a comprehensive network monitoring tool with a wide range of features, while Wireshark is a packet analyzer tool that focuses on capturing and analyzing network traffic. PRTG provides real-time monitoring and alerting for network performance, while Wireshark offers more in-depth packet-level analysis for troubleshooting and security purposes.
Cons of PRTG
- Poor search capabilities1
- Graphs are static1
- Running on windows1