StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. PureScript vs React

PureScript vs React

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
PureScript
PureScript
Stacks88
Followers86
Votes18
GitHub Stars8.8K
Forks569

PureScript vs React: What are the differences?

Introduction

PureScript and React are both popular technologies used in web development. However, they have key differences in terms of their approach, architecture, and language. In this article, I will outline six key differences between PureScript and React.

  1. Language Paradigm: PureScript is a statically-typed functional programming language, whereas React is a JavaScript library for building user interfaces. PureScript follows a purely functional programming paradigm and encourages immutability and functional composition. On the other hand, React can be used with both functional and object-oriented programming styles.

  2. Type System: PureScript has a more advanced and expressive type system compared to React. It features type inference, higher kinded types, type classes, and row types. This enables developers to catch errors at compile-time and write more robust code. React, being primarily a JavaScript library, relies on the type system provided by JavaScript, which is less powerful and lacks many advanced features.

  3. State Management: PureScript provides various libraries and approaches for state management, including functional reactive programming (FRP) libraries like purescript-aff, purescript-signal, and purescript-behaviors. These libraries allow for declarative and composable state management. In contrast, React does not offer built-in state management solutions and requires the use of third-party libraries like Redux or MobX.

  4. Component Model: React follows a component-based architecture, where UI is broken down into reusable components that encapsulate their own state and behavior. These components are built using JavaScript and JSX (a syntax extension for JavaScript). PureScript, being its own programming language, has its own component model built around the React-like purescript-react library. The component model in PureScript encourages a functional programming approach and emphasizes immutability and composition.

  5. Learning Curve: PureScript can have a steeper learning curve compared to React. This is largely due to its functional programming nature, advanced type system, and the need to familiarize oneself with the PureScript ecosystem. React, on the other hand, has a larger community and extensive documentation, making it more beginner-friendly and accessible to developers with a JavaScript background.

  6. Tooling and Ecosystem: React has a vast and mature ecosystem with numerous libraries, tools, and frameworks available, making it easier to find solutions and integrate with other technologies. PureScript, being a less widely adopted language, has a smaller ecosystem with fewer libraries and tools. However, it still has a vibrant community and growing set of libraries for web development.

In summary, PureScript and React differ in terms of programming paradigm, type system, state management, component model, learning curve, and ecosystem. PureScript emphasizes functional programming, offers a powerful type system, and provides built-in state management solutions. React, on the other hand, is a JavaScript library, supports both functional and object-oriented programming, and relies on external state management libraries.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, PureScript

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
PureScript
PureScript

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
8.8K
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
569
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
88
Followers
147.0K
Followers
86
Votes
4.1K
Votes
18
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 6
    Purely functional
  • 4
    Great FFI to JavaScript
  • 2
    Alternate backends
  • 2
    The best type system
  • 1
    Libraries
Cons
  • 1
    Have Some Bugs
  • 1
    No JSX/Template
  • 1
    Not so fancy error reporting

What are some alternatives to React, PureScript?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Elm

Elm

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

Julia

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot