StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Terminal Emulators
  5. Putty vs SecureCRT

Putty vs SecureCRT

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Putty
Putty
Stacks182
Followers117
Votes2
SecureCRT
SecureCRT
Stacks4
Followers5
Votes0

Putty vs SecureCRT: What are the differences?

Introduction

This document outlines the key differences between Putty and SecureCRT.

  1. Installation Process: Putty is a lightweight and easy-to-install software that requires a simple setup process. On the other hand, SecureCRT requires a more complex installation process with additional configuration options and dependencies.

  2. Encryption and Security Features: SecureCRT offers a wide range of encryption and security features, including support for SSH, SSL, and Kerberos. It allows for secure remote access and data transmission. Putty, while secure, has fewer encryption and security options compared to SecureCRT.

  3. Customization and Flexibility: SecureCRT provides more customization options and flexibility to its users. It allows the creation of custom commands, custom keymaps, and the ability to save and share sessions. Putty, while customizable, has fewer options for customization compared to SecureCRT.

  4. User Interface: Putty has a simple and straightforward user interface, which makes it easy to navigate and use. SecureCRT, on the other hand, offers a more advanced and feature-rich interface that provides more control and options to the users.

  5. Automation and Scripting: SecureCRT provides advanced automation and scripting capabilities, allowing users to create and run scripts for repetitive tasks. Putty, although it supports basic scripting, does not offer the same level of automation features as SecureCRT.

  6. Cross-Platform Compatibility: Putty is primarily designed for Windows operating systems, while SecureCRT is available for Windows, macOS, and Linux. SecureCRT's cross-platform compatibility makes it a more versatile choice for users working on different operating systems.

In summary, Putty and SecureCRT differ in terms of installation process, encryption and security features, customization and flexibility, user interface, automation and scripting capabilities, and cross-platform compatibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Putty
Putty
SecureCRT
SecureCRT

It is an SSH and telnet client, developed originally by Simon Tatham for the Windows platform. It is open source software that is available with source code and is developed and supported by a group of volunteers.

It provides rock-solid terminal emulation for computing professionals, raising productivity with advanced session management and a host of ways to save time and streamline repetitive tasks. It provides secure remote access, file transfer, and data tunneling for everyone in your organization.

SSH client
Keyword highlighting enhancement; Command Manager (Windows only); Local shell session (Windows); True Color support; Dark Mode support
Statistics
Stacks
182
Stacks
4
Followers
117
Followers
5
Votes
2
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    More popular
  • 1
    Free
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows

What are some alternatives to Putty, SecureCRT?

iTerm2

iTerm2

A replacement for Terminal and the successor to iTerm. It works on Macs with macOS 10.12 or newer. iTerm2 brings the terminal into the modern age with features you never knew you always wanted.

Windows Terminal

Windows Terminal

A new, modern, feature-rich, productive terminal application for command-line users. It includes many of the features most frequently requested by the Windows command-line community.

Alacritty

Alacritty

It is the fastest terminal emulator in existence. Using the GPU for rendering enables optimizations that simply aren't possible without it. It currently supports macOS, Linux, BSD, and Windows.

Hyper Terminal

Hyper Terminal

The goal of the project is to create a beautiful and extensible experience for command-line interface users, built on open web standards. Focus will be primarily around speed and stability.

Cmder

Cmder

It is a software package created out of pure frustration over the absence of nice console emulators on Windows. It is based on amazing software, and spiced up with the Monokai color scheme and a custom prompt layout.

ConEmu

ConEmu

It aims to be handy, comprehensive, fast and reliable terminal window where you may host any console application developed either for WinAPI (cmd, powershell, far) or Unix PTY (cygwin, msys, wsl bash).

Wave Terminal

Wave Terminal

It is an open-source, AI-native terminal that streamlines developer workflows with inline rendering, a modern UI, and persistent sessions. It offers plugins for rendering various file types, a powerful code editor, seamless local and remote session management, and native AI integration.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope