PyQt vs Xamarin

Overview

Xamarin

Stacks1.3K

Followers1.5K

Votes785

PyQt

Stacks60

Followers132

Votes0

PyQt vs Xamarin: What are the differences?

## Introduction
In this Markdown post, we will discuss the key differences between PyQt and Xamarin.

1. **Platform Compatibility**: PyQt is primarily for developing desktop applications that run on major operating systems such as Windows, macOS, and Linux, while Xamarin is focused on creating mobile applications for iOS and Android platforms.
2. **Programming Language**: PyQt uses Python as the programming language, which is known for its simplicity and readability, whereas Xamarin allows development in C# which provides better performance and type safety compared to Python.
3. **User Interface Design**: PyQt offers a wide range of customizable widgets and tools for creating desktop user interfaces, while Xamarin provides a variety of native UI components for building mobile applications that result in a more seamless user experience.
4. **Development Tools**: PyQt relies on Qt Designer for creating user interfaces and Qt Creator as the integrated development environment (IDE), whereas Xamarin offers Visual Studio as the primary IDE with built-in support for code sharing and debugging across different platforms.
5. **Community Support**: PyQt has a strong community of Python developers who contribute to ongoing development and provide extensive documentation and tutorials, while Xamarin benefits from Microsoft's backing, resulting in regular updates, technical support, and integration with popular Microsoft technologies.
6. **Deployment and Licensing**: PyQt applications can be deployed with open-source licensing options, enabling free distribution, while Xamarin requires a commercial license for deploying apps on mobile app stores, which may involve additional costs.

In Summary, By considering factors like platform compatibility, programming language, user interface design, development tools, community support, and deployment options, developers can choose between PyQt and Xamarin based on their specific project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Xamarin	PyQt
Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.	It is a set of Python v2 and v3 bindings for Qt application framework and runs on all platforms supported by Qt including Windows, OS X, Linux, iOS and Android. PyQt5 supports Qt v5. PyQt4 supports Qt v4 and will build against Qt v5. The bindings are implemented as a set of Python modules and contain over 1,000 classes.
Cross-platform development- Thinking about supporting iOS, Android, Mac and Windows? Xamarin allows you to write it all in C#.;Reuse existing code- Use your favorite .NET libraries in Xamarin apps. Easily use third-party native libraries and frameworks.; Discover as you type- Explore APIs as you type with code autocompletion.;Visual Studio or Xamarin Studio- Create, build, debug, and deploy apps in Visual Studio. Or use Xamarin Studio, a fully-featured IDE that is built for mobile app development.;Native UI, Native Performance- Xamarin delivers high performance compiled code with full access to all the native APIs so you can create native apps with device-specific experiences.; Point and Click UI Design- Xamarin provides a world class Android UI designer. Use Apple Xcode UI designer to create interfaces and Storyboards that automatically sync with your Xamarin.iOS project.	runs on all platforms; bindings for Qt application framework
Statistics
Stacks 1.3K	Stacks 60
Followers 1.5K	Followers 132
Votes 785	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 121 Power of c# on mobile devices 81 Native performance 79 Native apps with native ui controls 73 No javascript - truely compiled code 67 Sharing more than 90% of code over all platforms Cons 9 Build times 5 Visual Studio 4 Price 3 Complexity 3 Scalability	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Windows Linux Mint Linux

What are some alternatives to Xamarin, PyQt?

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Expo

It is a framework and a platform for universal React applications. It is a set of tools and services built around React Native and native platforms that help you develop, build, deploy, and quickly iterate on iOS, Android, and web apps.

Vue Native

Vue Native is a mobile framework to build truly native mobile app using Vue.js. Its is designed to connect React Native and Vue.js. Vue Native is a wrapper around React Native APIs, which allows you to use Vue.js and compose rich mobile User Interface.

Related Comparisons

PyQt vs Xamarin: What are the differences?

## Introduction
In this Markdown post, we will discuss the key differences between PyQt and Xamarin.

1. **Platform Compatibility**: PyQt is primarily for developing desktop applications that run on major operating systems such as Windows, macOS, and Linux, while Xamarin is focused on creating mobile applications for iOS and Android platforms.
2. **Programming Language**: PyQt uses Python as the programming language, which is known for its simplicity and readability, whereas Xamarin allows development in C# which provides better performance and type safety compared to Python.
3. **User Interface Design**: PyQt offers a wide range of customizable widgets and tools for creating desktop user interfaces, while Xamarin provides a variety of native UI components for building mobile applications that result in a more seamless user experience.
4. **Development Tools**: PyQt relies on Qt Designer for creating user interfaces and Qt Creator as the integrated development environment (IDE), whereas Xamarin offers Visual Studio as the primary IDE with built-in support for code sharing and debugging across different platforms.
5. **Community Support**: PyQt has a strong community of Python developers who contribute to ongoing development and provide extensive documentation and tutorials, while Xamarin benefits from Microsoft's backing, resulting in regular updates, technical support, and integration with popular Microsoft technologies.
6. **Deployment and Licensing**: PyQt applications can be deployed with open-source licensing options, enabling free distribution, while Xamarin requires a commercial license for deploying apps on mobile app stores, which may involve additional costs.

PyQt vs Xamarin

Overview