StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtualization Platform
  5. Qemu vs VMware Fusion

Qemu vs VMware Fusion

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

VMware Fusion
VMware Fusion
Stacks84
Followers70
Votes0
Qemu
Qemu
Stacks105
Followers131
Votes3

Qemu vs VMware Fusion: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare the key differences between Qemu and VMware Fusion. Qemu and VMware Fusion are both virtualization software solutions that allow users to run multiple operating systems on a single host machine. However, they differ in various aspects, as outlined below.

  1. Hardware Virtualization Support: Qemu is capable of running virtual machines without hardware virtualization support, also known as software virtualization. On the other hand, VMware Fusion requires hardware-assisted virtualization to run virtual machines efficiently. This means that Qemu can be used on older systems that lack hardware virtualization support, while VMware Fusion requires a computer with specific hardware capabilities.

  2. Supported Operating Systems: Qemu is known for its versatility and is compatible with various operating systems, including Linux, Windows, macOS, and others. In contrast, VMware Fusion is primarily designed for macOS systems and is specifically optimized for running operating systems such as Windows, Linux, and macOS as virtual machines.

  3. Performance and Optimization: While Qemu provides a reasonably good performance for most virtualization tasks, VMware Fusion offers enhanced performance, especially when it comes to graphics-intensive applications. VMware Fusion leverages hardware acceleration and optimization techniques to provide a more seamless and efficient virtualization experience.

  4. Ease of Use and User Interface: Qemu primarily operates through a command-line interface (CLI) and requires users to manually configure and manage virtual machines. On the other hand, VMware Fusion provides a user-friendly graphical user interface (GUI) that simplifies the creation, management, and customization of virtual machines, making it more accessible to users without extensive technical knowledge.

  5. Integration with Host Operating System: Qemu runs virtual machines as independent entities and does not provide direct integration with the host operating system. In contrast, VMware Fusion seamlessly integrates virtual machines with the macOS host, offering features like shared folders, drag-and-drop functionality, Unity mode (for running applications from the virtual machine directly on the host), and more.

In summary, Qemu is a versatile and flexible virtualization solution that can run on a wide range of operating systems, offers software virtualization support, and operates primarily through the command line. On the other hand, VMware Fusion is specifically designed for macOS systems, provides enhanced performance and graphics capabilities, offers a user-friendly interface, and integrates virtual machines with the host operating system for a more seamless experience.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

VMware Fusion
VMware Fusion
Qemu
Qemu

It gives Mac users the power to run Windows on Mac along with hundreds of other operating systems side by side with Mac applications, without rebooting. It is simple enough for home users and powerful enough for IT professionals, developers and businesses.

When used as a machine emulator, it can run OSes and programs made for one machine (e.g. an ARM board) on a different machine (e.g. your own PC). By using dynamic translation, it achieves very good performance. When used as a virtualizer, it achieves near native performance by executing the guest code directly on the host CPU. it supports virtualization when executing under the Xen hypervisor or using the KVM kernel module in Linux. When using KVM, it can virtualize x86, server and embedded PowerPC, 64-bit POWER, S390, 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, and MIPS guests.

-
machine emulator and virtualizer; dynamic translation;
Statistics
Stacks
84
Stacks
105
Followers
70
Followers
131
Votes
0
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 1
    Performance
  • 1
    Free
  • 1
    Easy to use
Integrations
No integrations available
Linux
Linux
KVM
KVM

What are some alternatives to VMware Fusion, Qemu?

VirtualBox

VirtualBox

VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.

Proxmox VE

Proxmox VE

It is a complete open-source platform for all-inclusive enterprise virtualization that tightly integrates KVM hypervisor and LXC containers, software-defined storage and networking functionality on a single platform, and easily manages high availability clusters and disaster recovery tools with the built-in web management interface.

VMware vSphere

VMware vSphere

vSphere is the world’s leading server virtualization platform. Run fewer servers and reduce capital and operating costs using VMware vSphere to build a cloud computing infrastructure.

KVM

KVM

KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V).

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop for Mac allows you to seamlessly run both Windows and MacOS applications side-by-side with speed, control and confidence.

Parallels

Parallels

It is an application and desktop virtualization software vendor that offers management and delivery platforms for Apple macOS and Microsoft Windows desktop deployments.

Xen

Xen

It is a hypervisor using a microkernel design, providing services that allow multiple computer operating systems to execute on the same computer hardware concurrently. It was developed by the Linux Foundation and is supported by Intel.

VMware vSAN

VMware vSAN

It is enterprise-class, storage virtualization software that, when combined with vSphere, allows you to manage compute and storage with a single platform. You can reduce the cost and complexity of traditional storage and take the easiest path to hyperconverged infrastructure and hybrid cloud. Evolve to an integrated hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) solution with vSAN to improve business agility, all while speeding operations and lowering costs.

Oracle VM Server

Oracle VM Server

It is a zero license cost server virtualization and management solution that makes enterprise applications easier to deploy, manage, and support. Backed worldwide by affordable enterprise-quality support for both Oracle and non-Oracle environments, it reduces operations and support costs while increasing IT efficiency and agility.

Virtuozzo

Virtuozzo

It is an operating system-level server virtualization solution designed to centralize server management and consolidate workloads, which reduces overhead by reducing the number of physical servers required. Organizations use it for server consolidation, disaster recovery, and server workload agility.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana