StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Realtime Backend API
  5. Radar vs Unifrost

Radar vs Unifrost

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Radar
Radar
Stacks3
Followers17
Votes0
GitHub Stars220
Forks43
Unifrost
Unifrost
Stacks0
Followers5
Votes0

Radar vs Unifrost: What are the differences?

Developers describe Radar as "High level API and backend for writing web apps that use push messaging". Radar is built on top of engine.io, the next-generation backend for socket.io. It uses Redis for backend storage, though the assumption is that this is only for storing currently active data. On the other hand, Unifrost is detailed as "Stream PubSub Messages to the Browser". It is a go module for relaying pubsub messages to the web via SSE(Eventsource). It is based on Twitter's implementation for real-time event-streaming in their new web app.

Radar and Unifrost can be primarily classified as "Realtime Backend / API" tools.

Some of the features offered by Radar are:

  • More than just pub/sub: a resource-based API for presence, messaging and push notifications via a Javascript client library
  • Written in Javascript/Node.js, and uses engine.io (the new, low-level complement to socket.io)
  • Backend to multiple front-facing servers

On the other hand, Unifrost provides the following key features:

  • Supports Go modules
  • Uses Server-Sent-Events
  • Can be embedded in your api server

Radar and Unifrost are both open source tools. It seems that Radar with 210 GitHub stars and 36 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Unifrost with 136 GitHub stars and 8 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Radar
Radar
Unifrost
Unifrost

Radar is built on top of engine.io, the next-generation backend for socket.io. It uses Redis for backend storage, though the assumption is that this is only for storing currently active data.

It is a go module for relaying pubsub messages to the web via SSE(Eventsource). It is based on Twitter's implementation for real-time event-streaming in their new web app.

More than just pub/sub: a resource-based API for presence, messaging and push notifications via a Javascript client library;Written in Javascript/Node.js, and uses engine.io (the new, low-level complement to socket.io);Backend to multiple front-facing servers;REST API for working with web apps that don't use Node (presently, rework in progress)
Supports Go modules ; Uses Server-Sent-Events; Can be embedded in your api server
Statistics
GitHub Stars
220
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
43
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
3
Stacks
0
Followers
17
Followers
5
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Golang
Golang
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Kafka
Kafka
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
NATS
NATS

What are some alternatives to Radar, Unifrost?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase