Rails API vs Vapor

Overview

Rails API

Stacks95

Followers142

Votes16

GitHub Stars5.1K

Forks275

Vapor

Stacks117

Followers217

Votes65

Rails API vs Vapor: What are the differences?

Routing and Controllers: In Rails API, the routing and controllers are handled in a traditional MVC pattern, where routes are defined in config/routes.rb and controllers in app/controllers. Vapor, on the other hand, uses a more streamlined approach with routing and controllers handled within the Vapor project hierarchy.
ORM and Database Integration: Rails API uses ActiveRecord as its ORM for database integration, providing a robust set of tools for interacting with databases. Vapor, however, leverages Fluent as its ORM, offering similar functionalities to ActiveRecord but tailored for use with Swift and the Vapor framework.
Language and Ecosystem: Rails API is built on Ruby, which is a dynamic, interpreted language known for its simplicity and readability. Vapor is built with Swift, a statically typed language with a strong emphasis on safety and performance. This difference in languages also impacts the ecosystems surrounding these frameworks.
Performance and Scalability: Rails API is known for its ease of use and quick development cycle, but can suffer from performance issues and scalability challenges in high-traffic applications. Vapor, being built with Swift, is highly performant and scalable, making it suitable for demanding applications where speed and efficiency are crucial.
Community and Documentation: The Rails community is well-established and has a wealth of resources and documentation available for developers. On the other hand, Vapor, being a newer framework, has a smaller but growing community with evolving documentation. This can impact the support and learning resources available to developers using each framework.
Hosting and Deployment: Rails applications are commonly hosted on platforms like Heroku or AWS, with deployment processes streamlined for Rails applications. Vapor applications, on the other hand, require specialized hosting environments to run Swift applications, which may require more specialized knowledge and configuration for deployment.

In Summary, the key differences between Rails API and Vapor lie in their routing and controllers structure, ORM and database integration, choice of programming language and ecosystem, performance and scalability, community and documentation availability, as well as hosting and deployment processes.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Rails API	Vapor
Rails::API is a subset of a normal Rails application, created for applications that don't require all functionality that a complete Rails application provides. It is a bit more lightweight, and consequently a bit faster than a normal Rails application. The main example for its usage is in API applications only, where you usually don't need the entire Rails middleware stack nor template generation.	Vapor is the first true web framework for Swift. It provides a beautifully expressive foundation for your app without tying you to any single server implementation.
-	Pure Swift (No makefiles, module maps);Modular;Beautifully expressive
Statistics
GitHub Stars 5.1K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 275	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 95	Stacks 117
Followers 142	Followers 217
Votes 16	Votes 65
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 Great for quick decoupled apps 5 Lightweight 3 Simply the best 2 Soon to be merged into core Rails 5 1 Logging by default	Pros 13 Fast 11 Swift 10 Type-safe 6 Great for apis 5 Good Abstraction Cons 1 Server side swift is still in its infancy 1 Not as much support available.
Integrations
Ruby	Swift

What are some alternatives to Rails API, Vapor?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Rails API vs Vapor: What are the differences?

Routing and Controllers: In Rails API, the routing and controllers are handled in a traditional MVC pattern, where routes are defined in config/routes.rb and controllers in app/controllers. Vapor, on the other hand, uses a more streamlined approach with routing and controllers handled within the Vapor project hierarchy.
ORM and Database Integration: Rails API uses ActiveRecord as its ORM for database integration, providing a robust set of tools for interacting with databases. Vapor, however, leverages Fluent as its ORM, offering similar functionalities to ActiveRecord but tailored for use with Swift and the Vapor framework.
Language and Ecosystem: Rails API is built on Ruby, which is a dynamic, interpreted language known for its simplicity and readability. Vapor is built with Swift, a statically typed language with a strong emphasis on safety and performance. This difference in languages also impacts the ecosystems surrounding these frameworks.
Performance and Scalability: Rails API is known for its ease of use and quick development cycle, but can suffer from performance issues and scalability challenges in high-traffic applications. Vapor, being built with Swift, is highly performant and scalable, making it suitable for demanding applications where speed and efficiency are crucial.
Community and Documentation: The Rails community is well-established and has a wealth of resources and documentation available for developers. On the other hand, Vapor, being a newer framework, has a smaller but growing community with evolving documentation. This can impact the support and learning resources available to developers using each framework.
Hosting and Deployment: Rails applications are commonly hosted on platforms like Heroku or AWS, with deployment processes streamlined for Rails applications. Vapor applications, on the other hand, require specialized hosting environments to run Swift applications, which may require more specialized knowledge and configuration for deployment.

Rails API vs Vapor

Overview