StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. React vs Vaadin

React vs Vaadin

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
Vaadin
Vaadin
Stacks201
Followers279
Votes36
GitHub Stars631
Forks81

React vs Vaadin: What are the differences?

React vs Vaadin

React and Vaadin are both popular frameworks used for building web applications. While they have some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will discuss six main differences between React and Vaadin.

  1. Programming Paradigm: React is based on the JavaScript library for building user interfaces, while Vaadin is a full-stack framework that utilizes the Java language for both frontend and backend development. React follows a component-based approach, allowing developers to build UI components separately and then combine them. Vaadin, on the other hand, uses a server-side model where most of the UI rendering and logic are handled on the server.

  2. Language: React is primarily based on JavaScript, which is a widely adopted programming language for web development. On the other hand, Vaadin uses Java, a popular object-oriented language with a large ecosystem of libraries and tools. The choice of language can have an impact on the development team's familiarity and skill set.

  3. Rendering: React uses a virtual DOM, which is a lightweight copy of the actual DOM. When the state of a component changes, React compares the virtual DOM with the real DOM and updates only the necessary parts, improving performance. Vaadin, on the other hand, relies on server-side rendering, where the UI components are rendered on the server and sent to the client as HTML. This can simplify the development process but may result in more server-round trips.

  4. Component Libraries: React has a vast ecosystem of third-party component libraries, offering a wide range of pre-built UI components that can be easily integrated into an application. Vaadin, on the other hand, has its own set of built-in components that follow a consistent design language and provide a seamless user experience out of the box. The choice between React's flexibility and community-driven libraries and Vaadin's integrated component set depends on the specific requirements of the project.

  5. Development Experience: React is known for its fast development cycle and hot module reloading, which allows developers to see changes immediately without manually refreshing the page. React also has a large community and extensive documentation, making it easier to find solutions to common problems. Vaadin, on the other hand, provides a more integrated development experience by handling the frontend and backend aspects within a single framework. This can simplify the development process but may require a steeper learning curve.

  6. Browser Compatibility: React is designed to work with all modern web browsers and provides cross-browser compatibility. However, when developing applications with Vaadin, it is important to ensure that the server-side components are compatible with the client's browser. This can be especially important when dealing with older browsers or specific browser features that may not be fully supported by Vaadin.

In summary, React and Vaadin differ in terms of programming paradigm, language, rendering approach, component libraries, development experience, and browser compatibility. The choice between React and Vaadin depends on factors such as the project requirements, team expertise, and development preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, Vaadin

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
Vaadin
Vaadin

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

It is the fastest way to build web applications in Java. It automates the communication between your server and the browser and gives you a high-level component API for all Vaadin components

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
631
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
81
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
201
Followers
147.0K
Followers
279
Votes
4.1K
Votes
36
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 9
    Java
  • 7
    Compatibility
  • 6
    Open Source
  • 6
    Components
  • 3
    Performance
Cons
  • 3
    Paid for more features

What are some alternatives to React, Vaadin?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase