React vs Velocity.js

Overview

React

Stacks182.6K

Followers147.0K

Votes4.1K

GitHub Stars240.3K

Forks49.7K

Velocity.js

Stacks6

Followers26

Votes0

GitHub Stars17.3K

Forks1.5K

React vs Velocity.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

This markdown code provides a comparison between React and Velocity.js, highlighting their key differences.

1. Rendering Process: React: React follows a virtual-DOM diffing algorithm which minimizes the number of updates needed to the actual DOM by comparing and updating only the necessary components. Velocity.js: Velocity.js directly animates the actual DOM, providing more control over the animation process.
2. Animation Capabilities: React: React focuses on building user interfaces and provides limited animation capabilities out-of-the-box. Velocity.js: Velocity.js is a standalone animation engine that offers extensive animation capabilities, allowing developers to create complex and customized animations.
3. Ease of Use: React: React provides a declarative approach to building UI components, allowing developers to easily manage component states and rendering logic. Velocity.js: Velocity.js requires manual coding to define and control animations, making it less beginner-friendly compared to React.
4. Performance: React: React is optimized for rendering complex UIs efficiently by minimizing the number of actual DOM updates, resulting in better performance. Velocity.js: Velocity.js delivers high-performance animations due to its efficient manipulation of the actual DOM, resulting in smooth and responsive animations.
5. Compatibility: React: React is a JavaScript library that can be used for building web, mobile, and desktop applications across various platforms. Velocity.js: Velocity.js is a JavaScript animation library specifically designed for web applications.
6. Community Support: React: React has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available online. Velocity.js: While Velocity.js has a smaller community compared to React, it still offers documentation and support for developers.

In Summary, React and Velocity.js differ in their rendering process, animation capabilities, ease of use, performance, compatibility, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on React, Velocity.js

Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceon

Vue.js

React

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k

Comments

Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k

Comments

Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

React	Velocity.js
Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.	It is an animation engine with the same API as jQuery's $.animate(). It works with and without jQuery. It is the best of jQuery and CSS transitions combined.
Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere	Color animation; Transforms; Loops; Easings; SVG support; Scrolling.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 240.3K	GitHub Stars 17.3K
GitHub Forks 49.7K	GitHub Forks 1.5K
Stacks 182.6K	Stacks 6
Followers 147.0K	Followers 26
Votes 4.1K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 837 Components 674 Virtual dom 579 Performance 509 Simplicity 442 Composable Cons 41 Requires discipline to keep architecture organized 30 No predefined way to structure your app 29 Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages 13 JSX 10 Not enterprise friendly	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Dojo layerJS ZingGrid fancybox DNN Stencil Blazejs Pilot jQWidgets UDash

What are some alternatives to React, Velocity.js?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

React vs Velocity.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

This markdown code provides a comparison between React and Velocity.js, highlighting their key differences.

1. Rendering Process: React: React follows a virtual-DOM diffing algorithm which minimizes the number of updates needed to the actual DOM by comparing and updating only the necessary components. Velocity.js: Velocity.js directly animates the actual DOM, providing more control over the animation process.
2. Animation Capabilities: React: React focuses on building user interfaces and provides limited animation capabilities out-of-the-box. Velocity.js: Velocity.js is a standalone animation engine that offers extensive animation capabilities, allowing developers to create complex and customized animations.
3. Ease of Use: React: React provides a declarative approach to building UI components, allowing developers to easily manage component states and rendering logic. Velocity.js: Velocity.js requires manual coding to define and control animations, making it less beginner-friendly compared to React.
4. Performance: React: React is optimized for rendering complex UIs efficiently by minimizing the number of actual DOM updates, resulting in better performance. Velocity.js: Velocity.js delivers high-performance animations due to its efficient manipulation of the actual DOM, resulting in smooth and responsive animations.
5. Compatibility: React: React is a JavaScript library that can be used for building web, mobile, and desktop applications across various platforms. Velocity.js: Velocity.js is a JavaScript animation library specifically designed for web applications.
6. Community Support: React: React has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available online. Velocity.js: While Velocity.js has a smaller community compared to React, it still offers documentation and support for developers.

In Summary, React and Velocity.js differ in their rendering process, animation capabilities, ease of use, performance, compatibility, and community support.