StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. React vs Webix

React vs Webix

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
Webix
Webix
Stacks18
Followers39
Votes0
GitHub Stars445
Forks85

React vs Webix: What are the differences?

Introduction

React and Webix are both popular JavaScript libraries used for building user interfaces. While they share some similarities, there are also key differences between the two.

  1. Component Structure: React is a component-based library that uses reusable components to build user interfaces. It follows a unidirectional data flow, where data changes flow from parent components to child components. On the other hand, Webix is a widget-based library that provides a set of pre-designed UI elements. It follows a bidirectional data flow, allowing data changes to flow both ways between components.

  2. Virtual DOM Rendering: React uses a virtual DOM (Document Object Model) to efficiently update and render components. It compares the virtual DOM with the real DOM and only updates the necessary changes, leading to better performance. Webix, on the other hand, directly manipulates the real DOM, which can be less efficient in terms of rendering and updating UI components.

  3. State Management: React provides a built-in state management solution, where each component has its own state that can be updated and managed. It also supports global state management using external libraries like Redux. Webix, on the other hand, does not provide a built-in state management solution. It relies on its widget-based structure to manage data and UI updates.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: React has a large and active community, with a vast ecosystem of libraries and tools. It is widely adopted and has extensive documentation and support available. Webix, although popular, has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to React. It may have limited third-party libraries and resources available for development.

  5. Learning Curve: React has a steeper learning curve, especially for beginners with limited knowledge of JavaScript and web development. It requires understanding concepts like virtual DOM, JSX syntax, and component lifecycle methods. Webix, on the other hand, has a relatively easier learning curve, as it provides a set of pre-designed UI elements that can be easily integrated into applications.

  6. License and Pricing: React is an open-source library released under the MIT license, which allows free usage and modification. Webix, on the other hand, has both open-source and commercial versions available. The commercial version offers additional features and support but comes with a price tag.

In summary, React and Webix differ in terms of their component structure, rendering approach, state management, community and ecosystem, learning curve, and license/pricing. React is more widely adopted and offers a more extensive ecosystem, while Webix provides a widget-based approach and easier learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, Webix

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
Webix
Webix

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

It is a cross-browser JavaScript UI widgets library. Build fast mobile and desktop web applications that run on all touch devices with HTML5 framework.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
Snippet Tool; Form Builder; Skin Builder; Webix Jet.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
445
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
85
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
18
Followers
147.0K
Followers
39
Votes
4.1K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to React, Webix?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase