Overview

Redux Offline

Stacks26

Followers74

Votes0

Stimulus

Stacks132

Followers106

Votes16

Redux Offline vs Stimulus: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will analyze the key differences between Redux Offline and Stimulus.

Architecture: Redux Offline follows a centralized state management approach where all the application's state is stored in a single global object called the store, facilitating easy debugging and predictable data flow. On the other hand, Stimulus is a minimal JavaScript framework that enhances the interactivity of HTML pages by managing behavior through controllers tied to specific elements, making it well-suited for enhancing existing server-rendered applications with sprinkles of client-side interactivity.
Use Cases: Redux Offline is commonly used in applications requiring offline capabilities, where it seamlessly integrates with Redux to handle actions when the device is offline and syncs the data when the connection is restored. In comparison, Stimulus is ideal for adding interactive components to server-rendered pages, providing a lightweight alternative to more comprehensive frontend frameworks like React or Angular.
Data Handling: Redux Offline excels in managing complex data flows and asynchronous actions, allowing developers to handle optimistic updates, offline mode, and synchronization in a consistent manner. In contrast, Stimulus focuses on enhancing user interactions without directly dealing with data management aspects, making it a preferred choice for applications where data manipulation is not the primary concern.
Learning Curve: Redux Offline may have a steeper learning curve for developers new to the Redux ecosystem due to its concepts of actions, reducers, and the overall state management workflow. On the other hand, Stimulus offers a simpler learning curve for developers familiar with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, making it easier to grasp and integrate into existing projects without extensive changes.
Community Support: Redux Offline benefits from the strong ecosystem and active community of Redux, ensuring robust support, numerous libraries, and an abundance of resources available for developers. In contrast, Stimulus, while maintained by a dedicated team, may have a smaller community compared to larger frontend frameworks, resulting in potentially fewer extensions and community-driven solutions.
Performance: Redux Offline's centralized state management can potentially provide better performance optimizations and efficient data handling in large-scale applications with complex state requirements. Stimulus, being lightweight and designed for enhancing presentational interactions, might offer faster initial load times and improved page responsiveness in simpler projects or instances where heavy data processing is not a primary concern.

In Summary, the key differences between Redux Offline and Stimulus lie in their architectures, use cases, data handling approaches, learning curves, community support, and performance optimizations, catering to diverse application requirements and developer preferences.

🔥 Trending in UI Components on StackShare

FigForm UI Components

FigForm

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

1

2

Advice on Redux Offline, Stimulus

Hampton

VP of Engineering at Veue

Oct 4, 2020

Decided

Starting a new company in 2020, with a whole new stack, is a really interesting opportunity for me to look back over the last 20 years of my career with web software and make the right decision for my company.

And, I went with the most radical decision– which is to ignore "sexy" / "hype" technologies almost entirely, and go back to a stack that I first used over 15 years ago.

For my purposes, we are building a video streaming platform, where I wanted rapid customer-facing feature development, high testability, simple scaling, and ease of hiring great, experienced talent. To be clear, our web platform is NOT responsible for handling the actual bits and bytes of the video itself, that's an entirely different stack. It simply needs to manage the business rules and the customers experience of the video content.

I reviewed a lot of different technologies, but none of them seemed to fit the bill as well as Rails did! The hype train had long left the station with Rails, and the community is a little more sparse than it was previously. And, to be honest, Ruby was the language that was easiest for developers, but I find that most languages out there have adopted many of it's innovations for ease of use – or at least corrected their own.

Even with all of that, Rails still seems like the best framework for developing web applications that are no more complex than they need to be. And that's key to me, because it's very easy to go use React and Redux and GraphQL and a whole host of AWS Lamba's to power my blog... but you simply don't actually NEED that.

There are two choices I made in our stack that were new for me personally, and very different than what I would have chosen even 5 years ago.

Postgres - I decided to switch from MySql to Postgres for this project. I wanted to use UUID's instead of numeric primary keys, and knew I'd have a couple places where better JSON/object support would be key. Mysql remains far more popular, but almost every developer I respect has switched and preferred Postgres with a strong passion. It's not "sexy" but it's considered "better".
Stimulus.js - This was definitely the biggest and wildest choice to make. Stimulus is a Javascript framework by my old friend Sam Stephenson (Prototype.js, rbenv, turbolinks) and DHH, and it is a sort of radical declaration that your Javascript in the browser can be both powerful and modern AND simple. It leans heavily on the belief that HTML-is-good and that data-* attributes are good. It focuses on the actions and interactions and not on the rendering aspects. It took me a while to wrap my head around, and I still have to remind myself, that server-side-HTML is how you solve many problems with this stack, and avoid trying to re-render things just in the browser. So far, I'm happy with this choice, but it is definitely a radical departure from the current trends.

471k views471k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Redux Offline	Stimulus
Persistent Redux store for Reasonaboutable™️ Offline-First applications, with first-class support for optimistic UI. Use with React, React Native, or as standalone state container for any web app.	Stimulus is a JavaScript framework with modest ambitions. It doesn't seek to take over your entire front-end—in fact, it's not concerned with rendering HTML at all.
Statistics
Stacks 26	Stacks 132
Followers 74	Followers 106
Votes 0	Votes 16
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 5 No Javascript on Backend 5 Simple and easy to start with 4 Balance between Front End and BackEnd 2 Easy way to add functionality to rails views Cons 2 Steep learning curve
Integrations
Redux React	JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Redux Offline, Stimulus?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.