StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Riot vs Webix

Riot vs Webix

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Webix
Webix
Stacks18
Followers39
Votes0
GitHub Stars445
Forks85
Riot
Riot
Stacks116
Followers100
Votes68
GitHub Stars14.9K
Forks966

Riot vs Webix: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison between Riot and Webix, we will highlight the key differences between these two JavaScript libraries.

  1. Component Architecture: Riot follows a minimalist approach with its lightweight and easy-to-use component architecture, making it ideal for creating small to medium-sized applications quickly. In contrast, Webix offers a comprehensive and feature-rich component library with a larger set of pre-built UI elements, making it suitable for complex and enterprise-level applications requiring extensive customization.

  2. Learning Curve: Riot's simplicity in design and structure results in a faster learning curve for new developers, allowing them to grasp the basics of building web applications efficiently. Webix, on the other hand, offers a more extensive set of functionalities that may require more time and effort to master, especially for beginners in web development.

  3. Community Support: Riot has a smaller community compared to Webix, which translates to fewer resources, tutorials, and community-driven plugins available for developers. Webix boasts a larger and more active community, providing extensive documentation, forums, and third-party integrations that can be beneficial for developers seeking help and support during the development process.

  4. Performance Optimization: Riot emphasizes performance optimization by keeping its core library lightweight and prioritizing minimal updates to the DOM, resulting in faster rendering and improved efficiency. Webix, while offering a wide range of features, may experience performance limitations in larger applications due to its extensive library size and complex component interactions.

  5. Customization Flexibility: Riot focuses on providing developers with the flexibility to customize and extend components as needed, allowing for greater control over the design and functionality of the application. In comparison, Webix offers a more opinionated approach with pre-designed components that may limit the level of customization available to developers, especially when dealing with unique or specific requirements.

In Summary, Riot excels in simplicity, performance, and customization flexibility, while Webix stands out for its comprehensive component library, community support, and scalability for enterprise-level applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Webix
Webix
Riot
Riot

It is a cross-browser JavaScript UI widgets library. Build fast mobile and desktop web applications that run on all touch devices with HTML5 framework.

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Snippet Tool; Form Builder; Skin Builder; Webix Jet.
Absolutely the smallest possible amount of DOM updates and reflows.;One way data flow: updates and unmounts are propagated downwards from parent to children.;Expressions are pre-compiled and cached for high performance.;Lifecycle events for more control.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
445
GitHub Stars
14.9K
GitHub Forks
85
GitHub Forks
966
Stacks
18
Stacks
116
Followers
39
Followers
100
Votes
0
Votes
68
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 13
    Its just easy... no training wheels needed
  • 13
    Light weight. Fast. Clear
  • 11
    Very simple, fast
  • 9
    Straightforward
  • 6
    Minimalistic
Cons
  • 1
    Smaller community
Integrations
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
React
React
JavaScript
JavaScript
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Webix, Riot?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase