StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Robot Framework vs TestNG

Robot Framework vs TestNG

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Robot Framework
Robot Framework
Stacks344
Followers525
Votes120
TestNG
TestNG
Stacks1.2K
Followers198
Votes0

Robot Framework vs TestNG: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Robot Framework and TestNG, highlighting the key differences between the two.

  1. Test Execution Framework: Robot Framework is an open-source, generic test automation framework that uses a keyword-driven approach. It provides easy-to-use keywords and supports both AI (Assertive Interface) and BDT (Behavior-Driven Testing). On the other hand, TestNG is a testing framework designed for unit, functional, and integration testing. It has extensive annotations and support for parallel and data-driven testing.
  2. Language Support: Robot Framework supports multiple programming languages such as Python, Java, .NET, and more. It allows users to write test cases using keywords in these languages. However, TestNG primarily works with Java and is built on top of Java Annotations.
  3. IDE Integration: Robot Framework integrates well with popular IDEs like Eclipse and PyCharm, providing syntax highlighting, auto-completion, and debugging capabilities. TestNG is widely used within the Java ecosystem and has good integration with IDEs like Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA, offering features like code completion and test execution directly from the IDE.
  4. Reporting and Logging: Robot Framework provides detailed reports and logs during test execution, including HTML, XML, and text reports. It also supports detailed log formatting and tagging for test cases and keywords. TestNG offers a comprehensive reporting feature with detailed HTML and XML reports, including information about test pass/fail status, execution time, and stack traces of failed tests.
  5. Parallel Execution: Robot Framework does not have built-in support for parallel test execution out-of-the-box. It can be achieved using external tools or plugins. On the other hand, TestNG has in-built support for parallel test execution, allowing users to run tests in parallel on multiple threads or machines, which can significantly reduce execution time for large test suites.
  6. Data-Driven Testing: Robot Framework provides extensive support for data-driven testing, allowing users to create test cases that can be executed with multiple sets of test data. It offers various methods (data tables, CSV files, databases) to handle test data. TestNG also supports data-driven testing through data providers, which allow users to supply test data from external sources like Excel, CSV, or databases. Additionally, TestNG provides data manipulation and data filtering capabilities.

In summary, Robot Framework is a versatile, keyword-driven test automation framework supporting multiple programming languages, while TestNG is a Java-based testing framework with extensive annotations and built-in support for parallel test execution. Both frameworks provide comprehensive reporting and logging features but differ in terms of their test execution framework, language support, IDE integration, parallel execution support, and data-driven testing capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Robot Framework
Robot Framework
TestNG
TestNG

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

It is a testing framework designed to simplify a broad range of testing needs, it covers all categories of tests: unit, functional, end-to-end, integration, etc.Run your tests in arbitrarily big thread pools with various policies available (all methods in their own thread, one thread per test class, etc.

-
Support for data-driven testing ; Support for parameters; Powerful execution model (no more TestSuite); Supported by a variety of tools and plug-ins (Eclipse, IDEA, Maven, etc
Statistics
Stacks
344
Stacks
1.2K
Followers
525
Followers
198
Votes
120
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 23
    Easy with CI/CD
  • 22
    Open Source
  • 21
    Simple Usage
  • 14
    Easily extendable
  • 13
    Vast Scope more than Front End
Cons
  • 8
    Nested Loops
  • 1
    Mostly for python
  • 1
    Devtooling is not there
  • 0
    Extensive library support
  • 0
    Mobile supports
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Eclipse
Eclipse
Apache Maven
Apache Maven

What are some alternatives to Robot Framework, TestNG?

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana