StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Rocket vs Yew Framework

Rocket vs Yew Framework

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Rocket
Rocket
Stacks91
Followers176
Votes12
Yew Framework
Yew Framework
Stacks24
Followers51
Votes0

Rocket vs Yew Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will compare the key differences between the Rocket and Yew frameworks. Rocket is a web framework for the Rust programming language, while Yew is a modern framework for creating web applications using Rust.

  1. Server-side vs Client-side Rendering: The most notable difference between Rocket and Yew lies in their rendering approach. Rocket focuses on server-side rendering, where the HTML is generated on the server and then sent to the client. On the other hand, Yew is built for client-side rendering, where the rendering happens within the web browser using JavaScript.

  2. Framework Purposes: Rocket is primarily designed for building web APIs and server-side applications. It provides tools and abstractions for handling HTTP requests, routing, and middleware. Yew, on the other hand, is specifically built for creating interactive and dynamic user interfaces in the browser. It leverages Rust's memory safety and performance with a virtual DOM and component-based architecture.

  3. Language Usage: Rocket is written in Rust and requires knowledge of the Rust programming language to use effectively. It allows developers to write server-side code using Rust's expressive and safe syntax. On the other hand, Yew also uses Rust for writing components, but it also requires knowledge of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript as it operates within the browser environment.

  4. Built-in Templates: Rocket provides built-in templating support using the Handlebars templating engine. This allows developers to easily generate dynamic HTML responses on the server-side. Yew, on the other hand, does not have built-in templating support as it focuses on client-side rendering. Instead, Yew utilizes its component-based architecture to dynamically update the DOM.

  5. Runtime Execution: Rocket applications are compiled into an executable binary that can be run as a standalone server. Once started, the Rocket server handles HTTP requests and responds accordingly. Yew applications, on the other hand, require a JavaScript runtime environment to execute. This means that Yew applications need to be bundled and served to the client's web browser.

  6. Community and Maturity: Rocket has been around for longer and has a more established community. It has a larger number of users and contributors, which translates to a more mature ecosystem. Yew, being a younger framework, has a smaller community, but it is growing rapidly as more developers discover the benefits of using Rust for web development.

In summary, Rocket and Yew differ in their rendering approach, with Rocket focusing on server-side rendering and Yew emphasizing client-side rendering. Rocket is designed for building web APIs and server-side applications, while Yew is focused on creating dynamic user interfaces in the browser. Rocket uses Rust for server-side code, while Yew incorporates Rust alongside HTML, CSS, and JavaScript for client-side rendering. Rocket provides built-in templating support, while Yew relies on its component-based architecture. Rocket applications are standalone servers, while Yew applications require a JavaScript runtime environment. Rocket has a more established community, while Yew is quickly growing in popularity.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Rocket
Rocket
Yew Framework
Yew Framework

Rocket is a web framework for Rust that makes it simple to write fast web applications without sacrificing flexibility or type safety. All with minimal code.

A modern Rust framework inspired by Elm and ReactJS. This framework is designed to be compiled into modern browsers' runtimes: wasm, asm.js, emscripten.

From request to response Rocket ensures that your types mean something; Boilerplate free; Easy to use; Extensible
Compile into modern browsers' runtimes: wasm, asm.js, emscripten; Uses own virtual-dom representation; Put pure Rust code into HTML tags; Use single-line or multi-line Rust comments inside html-templates
Statistics
Stacks
91
Stacks
24
Followers
176
Followers
51
Votes
12
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Uses all the rust features extensively
  • 1
    Provides nice abstractions
  • 1
    Inbuilt templating feature
  • 1
    Django analog in rust
Cons
  • 1
    Only runs in nightly
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Rust
Rust
WebAssembly
WebAssembly
Rust
Rust

What are some alternatives to Rocket, Yew Framework?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase