StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Javascript Build Tools
  5. Webpack vs rollup

Webpack vs rollup

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Webpack
Webpack
Stacks45.0K
Followers28.1K
Votes752
GitHub Stars65.7K
Forks9.2K
rollup
rollup
Stacks2.4K
Followers164
Votes17

Webpack vs rollup: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Webpack and Rollup. Both are popular module bundlers used in web development. Understanding their differences can help developers choose the most suitable tool for their projects.

  1. Tree-Shaking: Webpack and Rollup differ in how they handle tree-shaking, which is the process of eliminating dead code from the final bundle. Webpack uses static analysis to determine which modules are used and excludes the ones that are not, resulting in a larger bundle size. On the other hand, Rollup performs more advanced analysis and can achieve better tree-shaking, resulting in smaller bundle sizes.

  2. Code Splitting: When it comes to code splitting, Webpack and Rollup have different approaches. Webpack supports both dynamic and static code splitting, allowing developers to split their code into separate chunks that can be loaded on demand. Rollup, on the other hand, focuses more on static code splitting, which means that splitting happens at build time and not dynamically at runtime.

  3. Configuration: The configuration of Webpack and Rollup also differs. Webpack has a more complex configuration system with multiple configuration files and various plugins. This flexibility allows developers to customize the bundling process to a greater extent. On the other hand, Rollup has a simpler configuration system with a single configuration file, making it easier to set up and get started.

  4. Development vs Production: Webpack and Rollup also differ in their primary use cases. Webpack is often preferred for larger projects or projects that require more development-oriented features like hot module replacement and code splitting. Rollup, on the other hand, is commonly used for production builds where the focus is on producing efficient and optimized output.

  5. Bundle Formats: Both Webpack and Rollup support different bundle formats. Webpack primarily generates bundles in the CommonJS or AMD format, which are suitable for development environments. Rollup, on the other hand, excels at generating bundles in the ES module format, making it compatible with modern JavaScript development workflows.

  6. Performance: When it comes to performance, Webpack and Rollup have different trade-offs. Webpack is known for its efficiency in handling larger codebases and complex setups. It offers various optimizations and features that cater to the needs of larger projects but can come at the cost of longer build times. Rollup, on the other hand, is designed to be faster and more lightweight, making it a suitable choice for smaller projects or projects where build speed is crucial.

In summary, Webpack and Rollup have key differences in tree-shaking, code splitting, configuration, primary use cases, bundle formats, and performance. Understanding these differences can help developers choose the appropriate tool for their specific project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Webpack, rollup

Aleksandr
Aleksandr

Contract Software Engineer - Microsoft at Microsoft-365

Dec 23, 2019

Decided

Why migrated?

I could define the next points why we have to migrate:

  • Decrease build time of our application. (It was the main cause).
  • Also jspm install takes much more time than npm install.
  • Many config files for SystemJS and JSPM. For Webpack you can use just one main config file, and you can use some separate config files for specific builds using inheritance and merge them.
301k views301k
Comments
Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.

224k views224k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Webpack
Webpack
rollup
rollup

A bundler for javascript and friends. Packs many modules into a few bundled assets. Code Splitting allows to load parts for the application on demand. Through "loaders" modules can be CommonJs, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, Images, JSON, Coffeescript, LESS, ... and your custom stuff.

It is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into something larger and more complex, such as a library or application. It uses the new standardized format for code modules included in the ES6 revision of JavaScript, instead of previous idiosyncratic solutions such as CommonJS and AMD.

Bundles ES Modules, CommonJS, and AMD modules (even combined); Can create a single bundle or multiple chunks that are asynchronously loaded at runtime (to reduce initial loading time); Dependencies are resolved during compilation, reducing the runtime size; Loaders can preprocess files while compiling, e.g. TypeScript to JavaScript, Handlebars strings to compiled functions, images to Base64, etc; Highly modular plugin system to do whatever else your application requires
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
65.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
45.0K
Stacks
2.4K
Followers
28.1K
Followers
164
Votes
752
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 309
    Most powerful bundler
  • 182
    Built-in dev server with livereload
  • 142
    Can handle all types of assets
  • 87
    Easy configuration
  • 22
    Laravel-mix
Cons
  • 15
    Hard to configure
  • 5
    No clear direction
  • 2
    Spaghetti-Code out of the box
  • 2
    SystemJS integration is quite lackluster
  • 2
    Fire and Forget mentality of Core-Developers
Pros
  • 4
    Makes it easy to publish packages
  • 3
    Easier configuration
  • 2
    Better tree shaking
  • 2
    Provides smaller bundle size
  • 1
    Produces very clean code
Cons
  • 1
    Manual Chunking is a bit buggy
  • 1
    No clear path for static assets
  • 1
    Almost everything needs to be a Plugin
  • 1
    No Loader like Webpack (need to use sjs or ESM imports)
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Webpack, rollup?

gulp

gulp

Build system automating tasks: minification and copying of all JavaScript files, static images. More capable of watching files to automatically rerun the task when a file changes.

Grunt

Grunt

The less work you have to do when performing repetitive tasks like minification, compilation, unit testing, linting, etc, the easier your job becomes. After you've configured it, a task runner can do most of that mundane work for you—and your team—with basically zero effort.

Brunch

Brunch

Brunch is an assembler for HTML5 applications. It's agnostic to frameworks, libraries, programming, stylesheet & templating languages and backend technology.

Parcel

Parcel

Parcel is a web application bundler, differentiated by its developer experience. It offers blazing fast performance utilizing multicore processing, and requires zero configuration.

Backpack

Backpack

Backpack is minimalistic build system for Node.js. Inspired by Facebook's create-react-app, Zeit's Next.js, and Remy's Nodemon, Backpack lets you create modern Node.js apps and services with zero configuration. Backpack handles all the file-watching, live-reloading, transpiling, and bundling, so you don't have to.

Vite

Vite

It is an opinionated web dev build tool that serves your code via native ES Module imports during dev and bundles it with Rollup for production.

Pingy CLI

Pingy CLI

Gulp and Grunt and other heavyweight build tools are great for complicated build workflows. Sometimes you want something simpler that doesn't take lots of configuration to get up and running. That's Pingy CLI.

Microbundle

Microbundle

Zero-configuration bundler for tiny modules, powered by Rollup.

System.js

System.js

It is a Universal Module Loader for JavaScript. If you've used RequireJs or a CommonJs bundler in the past, you have probably created modules.Configurable module loader enabling dynamic ES module workflows in browsers and NodeJS.

Esbuild

Esbuild

It is an extremely fast JavaScript and CSS bundler and minifier. Current build tools for the web are 10-100x slower than they could be. The main goal of this project is to bring about a new era of build tool performance, and create an easy-to-use modern bundler along the way.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana