StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Rubygems Packages
  5. grpc vs http

grpc vs http

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

http
http
Stacks180
Followers4
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.0K
Forks329
grpc
grpc
Stacks18
Followers2
Votes0
GitHub Stars39.5K
Forks10.6K

grpc vs http: What are the differences?

Introduction:
gRPC and HTTP are both communication protocols used in web development. While both serve the purpose of enabling communication between systems, they have key differences that set them apart.

1. **Data serialization**: gRPC uses protocol buffers for data serialization, which is more efficient and smaller in size compared to JSON used in HTTP. This leads to faster data transmission and decreased latency in gRPC.
2. **Streaming**: gRPC supports both unary and streaming types of calls, allowing for bidirectional streaming of data. HTTP, on the other hand, primarily follows the request-response model, limiting its streaming capabilities.
3. **Protocol**: gRPC uses HTTP/2 as its underlying protocol, which supports features like multiplexing, header compression, and server push. This results in better performance and faster data transfer compared to HTTP/1.1.
4. **Code generation**: gRPC relies on code generation to create client and server stubs based on the specified protocol buffers. This enforces a strong contract between client and server, ensuring better type safety compared to manually written HTTP APIs.
5. **Error handling**: gRPC has a well-defined status and error handling mechanism, making it easier to distinguish between different types of errors. HTTP relies on status codes, which can be less descriptive and sometimes inconsistent across different APIs.
6. **Support for Load Balancing and Service Discovery**: gRPC has built-in support for load balancing and service discovery, making it easier to scale and manage services in distributed systems compared to HTTP.

In Summary, gRPC and HTTP differ in data serialization, streaming capabilities, underlying protocol, code generation, error handling, and support for load balancing and service discovery.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

http
http
grpc
grpc

An easy-to-use client library for making requests from Ruby. It uses a simple method chaining system for building requests, similar to Python's Requests.

Send RPCs from Ruby using GRPC.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.0K
GitHub Stars
39.5K
GitHub Forks
329
GitHub Forks
10.6K
Stacks
180
Stacks
18
Followers
4
Followers
2
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to http, grpc?

rake

rake

Rake is a Make-like program implemented in Ruby. Tasks and dependencies are specified in standard Ruby syntax. Rake has the following features: * Rakefiles (rake's version of Makefiles) are completely defined in standard Ruby syntax. No XML files to edit. No quirky Makefile syntax to worry about (is that a tab or a space?) * Users can specify tasks with prerequisites. * Rake supports rule patterns to synthesize implicit tasks. * Flexible FileLists that act like arrays but know about manipulating file names and paths. * Supports parallel execution of tasks.

pry

pry

An IRB alternative and runtime developer console.

rspec

rspec

BDD for Ruby.

rails

rails

Ruby on Rails is a full-stack web framework optimized for programmer happiness and sustainable productivity. It encourages beautiful code by favoring convention over configuration.

simplecov

simplecov

Code coverage for Ruby 1.9+ with a powerful configuration library and automatic merging of coverage across test suites.

puma

puma

Puma is a simple, fast, threaded, and highly concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby/Rack applications. Puma is intended for use in both development and production environments. It's great for highly concurrent Ruby implementations such as Rubinius and JRuby as well as as providing process worker support to support CRuby well.

pg

pg

Pg is the Ruby interface to the {PostgreSQL RDBMS}[http://www.postgresql.org/]. It works with {PostgreSQL 9.2 and later}[http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/]. A small example usage: #!/usr/bin/env ruby require 'pg' # Output a table of current connections to the DB conn = PG.connect( dbname: 'sales' ) conn.exec( "SELECT * FROM pg_stat_activity" ) do |result| puts " PID | User | Query" result.each do |row| puts " %7d | %-16s | %s " % row.values_at('procpid', 'usename', 'current_query') end end.

rspec-rails

rspec-rails

Rspec-rails is a testing framework for Rails 3+.

rubocop

rubocop

Automatic Ruby code style checking tool. Aims to enforce the community-driven Ruby Style Guide.

byebug

byebug

Byebug is a Ruby debugger. It's implemented using the TracePoint C API for execution control and the Debug Inspector C API for call stack navigation. The core component provides support that front-ends can build on. It provides breakpoint handling and bindings for stack frames among other things and it comes with an easy to use command line interface.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase