ScalaTest vs xUnit

Overview

xUnit

Stacks2.9K

Followers135

Votes0

GitHub Stars4.5K

Forks820

ScalaTest

Stacks857

Followers30

Votes0

GitHub Stars1.2K

Forks340

ScalaTest vs xUnit: What are the differences?

Language Support: ScalaTest is optimized for testing Scala code, providing specific features tailored to the language, such as matchers and DSLs that leverage Scala's syntax. On the other hand, xUnit is a more general testing framework that can be used with multiple programming languages, including Java, C#, Python, and more.
Test Structure: ScalaTest offers a wide range of testing styles, including FlatSpec, FunSpec, WordSpec, and more, allowing developers to choose the one that fits their needs and preferences. xUnit, on the other hand, follows a fixed test structure, with predefined methods like setup, teardown, and test methods that need to be implemented in test classes.
Assertions: ScalaTest provides a rich set of assertion libraries and matchers, allowing developers to write expressive and readable tests. xUnit typically offers a simpler assertion model with basic equality and truth assertions, keeping the focus on essential testing functionalities.
Concurrency Support: ScalaTest includes features for handling concurrent testing scenarios, such as running tests in parallel or isolating shared resources between tests. xUnit frameworks may have varying levels of concurrency support, with some requiring additional setup for parallel test execution.
Mocking and Stubbing: ScalaTest integrates seamlessly with popular mocking libraries like Mockito and ScalaMock, allowing developers to easily create mocks and stubs for testing dependencies. xUnit frameworks may have their mocking capabilities or rely on external libraries for mocking needs.
Community and Ecosystem: ScalaTest has a vibrant community of Scala developers who actively contribute to the framework and provide support through forums and resources. xUnit frameworks have a larger community due to their generic nature, with resources and tutorials available for various programming languages and ecosystems.

In Summary, ScalaTest is specialized for testing Scala code with advanced language-specific features, while xUnit is a versatile testing framework that can be used across different programming languages with a more standardized testing approach.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

xUnit	ScalaTest
It is a free, open source, community-focused unit testing tool for the .NET Framework. It is the latest technology for unit testing C#, F#, VB.NET and other .NET languages. It works with ReSharper, CodeRush, TestDriven.NET and Xamarin.	You can test Scala, Scala.js (JavaScript), and Java code with this tool. It makes it easy to take your testing to a higher, more productive level in new or existing Scala, Scala.js, or Java projects.
-	Test Scala, Scala.js (JavaScript), and Java code; Designed to grow with the demands of its users;Uses its own extension points to support several styles of testing out of the box
Statistics
GitHub Stars 4.5K	GitHub Stars 1.2K
GitHub Forks 820	GitHub Forks 340
Stacks 2.9K	Stacks 857
Followers 135	Followers 30
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	Scala Selenium Java Apache Maven Eclipse IntelliJ IDEA JUnit NetBeans IDE TestNG Scala.js

What are some alternatives to xUnit, ScalaTest?

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Related Comparisons

ScalaTest vs xUnit: What are the differences?

Language Support: ScalaTest is optimized for testing Scala code, providing specific features tailored to the language, such as matchers and DSLs that leverage Scala's syntax. On the other hand, xUnit is a more general testing framework that can be used with multiple programming languages, including Java, C#, Python, and more.
Test Structure: ScalaTest offers a wide range of testing styles, including FlatSpec, FunSpec, WordSpec, and more, allowing developers to choose the one that fits their needs and preferences. xUnit, on the other hand, follows a fixed test structure, with predefined methods like setup, teardown, and test methods that need to be implemented in test classes.
Assertions: ScalaTest provides a rich set of assertion libraries and matchers, allowing developers to write expressive and readable tests. xUnit typically offers a simpler assertion model with basic equality and truth assertions, keeping the focus on essential testing functionalities.
Concurrency Support: ScalaTest includes features for handling concurrent testing scenarios, such as running tests in parallel or isolating shared resources between tests. xUnit frameworks may have varying levels of concurrency support, with some requiring additional setup for parallel test execution.
Mocking and Stubbing: ScalaTest integrates seamlessly with popular mocking libraries like Mockito and ScalaMock, allowing developers to easily create mocks and stubs for testing dependencies. xUnit frameworks may have their mocking capabilities or rely on external libraries for mocking needs.
Community and Ecosystem: ScalaTest has a vibrant community of Scala developers who actively contribute to the framework and provide support through forums and resources. xUnit frameworks have a larger community due to their generic nature, with resources and tutorials available for various programming languages and ecosystems.

ScalaTest vs xUnit

Overview