StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Scene.js vs Sinuous

Scene.js vs Sinuous

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Scene.js
Scene.js
Stacks2
Followers18
Votes3
GitHub Stars2.8K
Forks162
Sinuous
Sinuous
Stacks0
Followers6
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.1K
Forks35

Scene.js vs Sinuous: What are the differences?

<Scene.js is a powerful JavaScript library for creating interactive animations and visual effects, while Sinuous is a lightweight and fast reactive virtual DOM library.>

  1. Language Support: Scene.js mainly focuses on providing animation support for HTML, SVG, and CSS properties, whereas Sinuous is more tailored towards reactive rendering of UI components in JavaScript.
  2. Animation Capabilities: Scene.js offers advanced features like keyframes, timeline controls, and easing functions for creating complex animations, whereas Sinuous prioritizes efficient DOM updates and re-renders for reactive web applications.
  3. File Size: Sinuous is known for its small footprint and minimal overhead, making it ideal for lightweight web projects, while Scene.js has a larger file size due to its extensive animation features and capabilities.
  4. Community Support: Sinuous has a smaller but dedicated community focused on performance and minimalism, while Scene.js has a larger user base due to its diverse animation tools and effects.
  5. Usage Scenarios: Scene.js is better suited for projects requiring rich visual effects and interactive animations, whereas Sinuous is more appropriate for building responsive and fast-rendering user interfaces in web applications.
  6. Learning Curve: Sinuous has a simpler API and concept for developers to pick up quickly and integrate into their projects, while Scene.js requires a deeper understanding of animation principles and timelines for effective usage.

In Summary, Scene.js and Sinuous differ in their focus on animation capabilities, file size, community support, usage scenarios, and learning curve for developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Scene.js
Scene.js
Sinuous
Sinuous

It is a JavaScript Animation Library For creating animated websites. It can control multiple elements at the same time. It supports a variety of value types, such as CSS, and can be handled in JavaScript.

It provides the clarity of declarative views and the performance of direct DOM manipulation. It helps keep your bundle size down, a basic counter is just shy of 1.4kB This makes it an ideal library to use in embeds, components, UI widgets, etc.

Powerful CSS animation; Control progress; Support SVG animation; Multiple timeline
provides a template add-on that can pre-render repetitive HTML snippets; makes your code clear, more predictable and easier to debug
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.8K
GitHub Stars
1.1K
GitHub Forks
162
GitHub Forks
35
Stacks
2
Stacks
0
Followers
18
Followers
6
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Powerful Animation
No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
JavaScript
JavaScript
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
Firefox
Firefox

What are some alternatives to Scene.js, Sinuous?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase