StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. AI
  3. Development & Training Tools
  4. Machine Learning Tools
  5. XGBoost vs scikit-learn

XGBoost vs scikit-learn

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

scikit-learn
scikit-learn
Stacks1.3K
Followers1.1K
Votes45
GitHub Stars63.9K
Forks26.4K
XGBoost
XGBoost
Stacks192
Followers86
Votes0
GitHub Stars27.6K
Forks8.8K

XGBoost vs scikit-learn: What are the differences?

Key Differences between XGBoost and scikit-learn

XGBoost and scikit-learn are both popular machine learning libraries used for predictive modeling tasks. While they share some similarities, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Gradient Boosting Implementation: XGBoost is an optimized implementation of gradient boosting, while scikit-learn provides a more generic implementation. XGBoost uses a more advanced boosting algorithm, which makes it faster and more accurate for certain tasks compared to scikit-learn.

  2. Regularization Techniques: XGBoost offers more advanced regularization techniques, such as L1 and L2 regularization, which help prevent overfitting of the model. Scikit-learn, on the other hand, provides simpler regularization methods such as ridge regression and LASSO.

  3. Parallel Computing: XGBoost can leverage parallel computing to speed up the training process, making it more efficient for large datasets. Scikit-learn, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for parallel computing.

  4. Handling Missing Values: XGBoost has built-in capabilities to handle missing values in the dataset, allowing the model to learn from the missing data. Scikit-learn, however, requires preprocessing steps to handle missing values before training the model.

  5. Native Support for Categorical Variables: XGBoost has native support for categorical variables, eliminating the need for one-hot encoding. Scikit-learn, on the other hand, requires categorical variables to be one-hot encoded before training.

  6. Model Interpretability: XGBoost provides more tools and techniques for model interpretability, allowing users to understand and explain how the model makes predictions. Scikit-learn provides fewer options for model interpretability.

In summary, XGBoost offers a more optimized implementation of gradient boosting, advanced regularization techniques, parallel computing support, and better handling of missing values and categorical variables compared to scikit-learn. Additionally, XGBoost provides more options for model interpretability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

scikit-learn
scikit-learn
XGBoost
XGBoost

scikit-learn is a Python module for machine learning built on top of SciPy and distributed under the 3-Clause BSD license.

Scalable, Portable and Distributed Gradient Boosting (GBDT, GBRT or GBM) Library, for Python, R, Java, Scala, C++ and more. Runs on single machine, Hadoop, Spark, Flink and DataFlow

-
Flexible; Portable; Multiple Languages; Battle-tested
Statistics
GitHub Stars
63.9K
GitHub Stars
27.6K
GitHub Forks
26.4K
GitHub Forks
8.8K
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
192
Followers
1.1K
Followers
86
Votes
45
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 26
    Scientific computing
  • 19
    Easy
Cons
  • 2
    Limited
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
C++
C++
Java
Java
Scala
Scala
Julia
Julia

What are some alternatives to scikit-learn, XGBoost?

TensorFlow

TensorFlow

TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API.

PyTorch

PyTorch

PyTorch is not a Python binding into a monolothic C++ framework. It is built to be deeply integrated into Python. You can use it naturally like you would use numpy / scipy / scikit-learn etc.

Keras

Keras

Deep Learning library for Python. Convnets, recurrent neural networks, and more. Runs on TensorFlow or Theano. https://keras.io/

Kubeflow

Kubeflow

The Kubeflow project is dedicated to making Machine Learning on Kubernetes easy, portable and scalable by providing a straightforward way for spinning up best of breed OSS solutions.

TensorFlow.js

TensorFlow.js

Use flexible and intuitive APIs to build and train models from scratch using the low-level JavaScript linear algebra library or the high-level layers API

Polyaxon

Polyaxon

An enterprise-grade open source platform for building, training, and monitoring large scale deep learning applications.

Streamlit

Streamlit

It is the app framework specifically for Machine Learning and Data Science teams. You can rapidly build the tools you need. Build apps in a dozen lines of Python with a simple API.

MLflow

MLflow

MLflow is an open source platform for managing the end-to-end machine learning lifecycle.

H2O

H2O

H2O.ai is the maker behind H2O, the leading open source machine learning platform for smarter applications and data products. H2O operationalizes data science by developing and deploying algorithms and models for R, Python and the Sparkling Water API for Spark.

PredictionIO

PredictionIO

PredictionIO is an open source machine learning server for software developers to create predictive features, such as personalization, recommendation and content discovery.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp