SQLite vs Scylla: What are the differences?
SQLite and Scylla are both popular database management systems, but they have key differences that set them apart.
-
Data Structure: SQLite is a relational database management system that stores data in tables with predefined schemas, while Scylla is a NoSQL database that uses a key-value pair approach with flexible schemas, allowing for easier scaling and higher performance in distributed environments.
-
Consistency vs. Availability: SQLite prioritizes data consistency by locking the entire database during write operations, ensuring ACID compliance, whereas Scylla focuses on high availability by allowing concurrent writes without locking, sacrificing some consistency in favor of better performance and uptime.
-
Storage Architecture: SQLite utilizes a single-file storage model, making it suitable for small-scale applications and embedded systems where simplicity is essential, while Scylla distributes data across multiple nodes in a cluster, providing horizontal scalability and fault tolerance for enterprise-grade workloads.
-
Query Language Support: SQLite supports SQL queries for data manipulation and retrieval, making it suitable for users familiar with SQL syntax, whereas Scylla uses CQL (Cassandra Query Language), a SQL-like language optimized for distributed environments, offering features like tunable consistency levels and automatic partitioning.
-
Use Cases: SQLite is often used in embedded systems, mobile applications, and small-scale websites that require a lightweight, self-contained database, while Scylla is designed for heavy workloads in big data, real-time analytics, and Internet of Things (IoT) applications that demand high throughput, low latency, and seamless scalability.
In Summary, SQLite and Scylla differ in terms of data structure, consistency vs. availability, storage architecture, query language support, and use cases, catering to distinct needs in various applications.