StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Semantic UI React vs Stimulus

Semantic UI React vs Stimulus

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Semantic UI React
Semantic UI React
Stacks227
Followers382
Votes28
GitHub Stars13.3K
Forks4.1K
Stimulus
Stimulus
Stacks132
Followers106
Votes16

Semantic UI React vs Stimulus: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Semantic UI React and Stimulus are both popular front-end frameworks used for web development. While both serve similar purposes, there are key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Component-based vs Behavior-driven: One major difference between Semantic UI React and Stimulus is their underlying architecture. Semantic UI React is a component-based framework that focuses on creating reusable UI components, allowing for easier maintainability and scalability of a project. On the other hand, Stimulus is a behavior-driven framework that primarily focuses on adding interactivity to HTML elements through controllers, making it more suitable for enhancing existing HTML structures with dynamic functionality.

  2. JavaScript vs JavaScript + HTML: In Semantic UI React, developers primarily write JavaScript code to create UI components and handle user interactions, keeping the presentation layer separate from the logic. In contrast, Stimulus encourages developers to write JavaScript code alongside HTML templates, enabling a more direct and interactive approach to building web interfaces.

  3. Custom Styling vs Minimal Styling: Semantic UI React provides a wide range of pre-designed components with predefined styling options, making it easier for developers to create visually appealing UIs without having to write custom CSS. In contrast, Stimulus focuses more on providing minimal styling and instead emphasizes the use of JavaScript to enhance the functionality of a webpage, allowing for more flexibility in terms of design customization.

  4. React Integration vs HTML Enhancement: Semantic UI React is specifically designed to work seamlessly with the React library, offering a set of React components that can be easily incorporated into React applications. On the other hand, Stimulus is framework-agnostic and can be used alongside any web framework, allowing developers to add interactivity to their projects without being tied to a specific technology stack.

  5. Community Support and Adoption: Semantic UI React has a large and active community of developers contributing to the framework, providing comprehensive documentation, support, and a wide range of third-party integrations. In comparison, Stimulus has a smaller but dedicated community focused on creating lightweight and efficient solutions for adding interactivity to web pages, with a specific emphasis on simplicity and performance.

  6. Learning Curve and Complexity: Semantic UI React may have a steeper learning curve due to its component-based architecture and reliance on React concepts, making it more suitable for developers already familiar with React or interested in learning the library. Stimulus, on the other hand, offers a simpler and more lightweight approach to adding interactivity to web pages, making it easier for beginners or developers looking for a straightforward solution for enhancing HTML elements with JavaScript functionality.

In Summary, Semantic UI React and Stimulus differ in their architectural approach, integration with other technologies, styling options, community support, and complexity, catering to different needs and preferences of developers in web development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Semantic UI React, Stimulus

Hampton
Hampton

VP of Engineering at Veue

Oct 4, 2020

Decided

Starting a new company in 2020, with a whole new stack, is a really interesting opportunity for me to look back over the last 20 years of my career with web software and make the right decision for my company.

And, I went with the most radical decision– which is to ignore "sexy" / "hype" technologies almost entirely, and go back to a stack that I first used over 15 years ago.

For my purposes, we are building a video streaming platform, where I wanted rapid customer-facing feature development, high testability, simple scaling, and ease of hiring great, experienced talent. To be clear, our web platform is NOT responsible for handling the actual bits and bytes of the video itself, that's an entirely different stack. It simply needs to manage the business rules and the customers experience of the video content.

I reviewed a lot of different technologies, but none of them seemed to fit the bill as well as Rails did! The hype train had long left the station with Rails, and the community is a little more sparse than it was previously. And, to be honest, Ruby was the language that was easiest for developers, but I find that most languages out there have adopted many of it's innovations for ease of use – or at least corrected their own.

Even with all of that, Rails still seems like the best framework for developing web applications that are no more complex than they need to be. And that's key to me, because it's very easy to go use React and Redux and GraphQL and a whole host of AWS Lamba's to power my blog... but you simply don't actually NEED that.

There are two choices I made in our stack that were new for me personally, and very different than what I would have chosen even 5 years ago.

  1. Postgres - I decided to switch from MySql to Postgres for this project. I wanted to use UUID's instead of numeric primary keys, and knew I'd have a couple places where better JSON/object support would be key. Mysql remains far more popular, but almost every developer I respect has switched and preferred Postgres with a strong passion. It's not "sexy" but it's considered "better".

  2. Stimulus.js - This was definitely the biggest and wildest choice to make. Stimulus is a Javascript framework by my old friend Sam Stephenson (Prototype.js, rbenv, turbolinks) and DHH, and it is a sort of radical declaration that your Javascript in the browser can be both powerful and modern AND simple. It leans heavily on the belief that HTML-is-good and that data-* attributes are good. It focuses on the actions and interactions and not on the rendering aspects. It took me a while to wrap my head around, and I still have to remind myself, that server-side-HTML is how you solve many problems with this stack, and avoid trying to re-render things just in the browser. So far, I'm happy with this choice, but it is definitely a radical departure from the current trends.

471k views471k
Comments
Amar
Amar

Mar 24, 2021

Review

You can develop your backend on Flask or Django. As it is just a blogging app, you can do with a simple ReST API & SQL Alchemy for storing data. But, if you really have time, I would recommend you to learn the MERN stack completely, i. e. MongoDB, Express, React, Node. Also don't forget to revisit the HTML5 & CSS3 features, CSS Animations & Transitions, etc. A pre-requisite for learning React & Node will be the Javascript language. Make sure you learn the basics, refer https://javascript.info. Only then start with React or Node.

28.6k views28.6k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Semantic UI React
Semantic UI React
Stimulus
Stimulus

Semantic UI React is the official React integration for Semantic UI. jQuery Free, Declarative API, Shorthand Props, and more.

Stimulus is a JavaScript framework with modest ambitions. It doesn't seek to take over your entire front-end—in fact, it's not concerned with rendering HTML at all.

No jQuery dependency;No animation dependencies;Reuse SUI CSS transitions
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
13.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
227
Stacks
132
Followers
382
Followers
106
Votes
28
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Great look&feel
  • 6
    Really adaptive -good support of different screen sizes
  • 5
    Great lib, lots of components enough to build a big app
  • 3
    Extensible and lots of components but no transitions
  • 2
    Documentation is also understandable
Cons
  • 3
    Poor Documentation
Pros
  • 5
    No Javascript on Backend
  • 5
    Simple and easy to start with
  • 4
    Balance between Front End and BackEnd
  • 2
    Easy way to add functionality to rails views
Cons
  • 2
    Steep learning curve
Integrations
React
React
Semantic UI
Semantic UI
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Semantic UI React, Stimulus?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase