StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Semantic UI React vs Vanilla.JS

Semantic UI React vs Vanilla.JS

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Semantic UI React
Semantic UI React
Stacks227
Followers382
Votes28
GitHub Stars13.3K
Forks4.1K
Vanilla.JS
Vanilla.JS
Stacks82
Followers85
Votes9

Semantic UI React vs Vanilla.JS: What are the differences?

Introduction: Semantic UI React is a widely used UI framework built on top of React that provides a set of components, themes, and styles for building modern web applications. On the other hand, Vanilla.JS refers to using plain JavaScript without any additional frameworks or libraries.

  1. Component Development: Semantic UI React offers a set of pre-built components such as buttons, inputs, and modals that can be easily used in web development. In contrast, Vanilla.JS requires developers to create and style components from scratch using JavaScript, HTML, and CSS.

  2. Ease of Use: Semantic UI React provides a more structured and consistent way of developing user interfaces by offering a standardized set of components and styling options. Vanilla.JS, on the other hand, requires developers to manually handle DOM manipulation and styling, which can be more time-consuming and error-prone.

  3. Community Support: Semantic UI React has a large and active community of developers who contribute to the project by creating new components, themes, and plugins. In comparison, Vanilla.JS does not have a specific community dedicated to providing official support or updates for the framework.

  4. Learning Curve: Semantic UI React abstracts some of the complexities of web development by providing a higher-level API for creating user interfaces, making it easier for beginners to get started. Vanilla.JS requires a deeper understanding of JavaScript, HTML, and CSS, which may pose a steeper learning curve for inexperienced developers.

  5. Integration with React Ecosystem: Semantic UI React is specifically designed to work seamlessly with React, leveraging its component-based architecture and state management capabilities. Vanilla.JS, on the other hand, may not integrate as smoothly with React, requiring additional effort to bridge the gap between the two frameworks.

  6. Performance Optimization: Semantic UI React comes with built-in performance optimizations such as virtualized rendering for long lists, lazy loading of components, and efficient event handling. Vanilla.JS developers need to implement these optimizations manually, which can be challenging for complex web applications.

In Summary, Semantic UI React provides a more structured and user-friendly approach to building modern web applications compared to the more manual and versatile approach of Vanilla.JS.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Semantic UI React
Semantic UI React
Vanilla.JS
Vanilla.JS

Semantic UI React is the official React integration for Semantic UI. jQuery Free, Declarative API, Shorthand Props, and more.

It is a fast and cross-platform framework for building incredible, powerful JavaScript applications. it is the most lightweight framework available anywhere.

No jQuery dependency;No animation dependencies;Reuse SUI CSS transitions
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
13.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
227
Stacks
82
Followers
382
Followers
85
Votes
28
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Great look&feel
  • 6
    Really adaptive -good support of different screen sizes
  • 5
    Great lib, lots of components enough to build a big app
  • 3
    Extensible and lots of components but no transitions
  • 2
    Documentation is also understandable
Cons
  • 3
    Poor Documentation
Pros
  • 2
    Lightweight
  • 2
    Web-components
  • 1
    Easy to learn
  • 1
    Faster than any framework
  • 1
    No buildtool overhead
Cons
  • 2
    You need to build anything yourself
Integrations
React
React
Semantic UI
Semantic UI
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Semantic UI React, Vanilla.JS?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase