Semantic UI vs Vapor

Overview

Semantic UI

Stacks992

Followers1.5K

Votes673

GitHub Stars51.2K

Forks4.9K

Vapor

Stacks117

Followers217

Votes65

Semantic UI vs Vapor: What are the differences?

Grid System: Semantic UI uses a responsive grid system that is based on Flexbox, allowing for more flexibility and control over layout arrangements. On the other hand, Vapor utilizes a similar grid system but has a different implementation that might require adjustments for developers accustomed to Semantic UI's grid structure.
Theming: Semantic UI comes with extensive theming capabilities, allowing users to easily customize the look and feel of their websites. In contrast, Vapor has a more limited theming functionality, which may restrict the level of customization compared to Semantic UI.
Component Library: Semantic UI offers a vast library of components that cover a wide range of UI elements, making it convenient for developers to quickly build websites. In comparison, Vapor has a smaller set of components available, potentially requiring developers to create custom solutions for some UI elements that are readily available in Semantic UI.
JavaScript Integration: Semantic UI provides seamless integration with JavaScript libraries like jQuery, making it easier to enhance interactivity on websites. On the contrary, Vapor may have a different approach to JavaScript integration, requiring developers to adapt their scripting methods when transitioning from Semantic UI.
Documentation: Semantic UI is known for its comprehensive documentation that includes clear examples and guidelines for implementing various features. In contrast, Vapor's documentation may not be as detailed or user-friendly, leading to potential challenges for developers seeking guidance on utilizing the framework effectively.
Community Support: Semantic UI has a robust community of users and contributors that actively engage in forums, provide support, and offer resources for developers. Vapor, being a newer framework, may have a smaller community base, resulting in fewer resources and community-driven solutions available for developers compared to Semantic UI.

In Summary, Semantic UI and Vapor differ in their grid system flexibility, theming capabilities, component libraries, JavaScript integration, documentation quality, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Semantic UI	Vapor
Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.	Vapor is the first true web framework for Swift. It provides a beautifully expressive foundation for your app without tying you to any single server implementation.
Build Responsive Layouts Easier;Self Explanatory;Tag ambivalent;Powerful tools for expressing groups and collections;Portable and self-contained	Pure Swift (No makefiles, module maps);Modular;Beautifully expressive
Statistics
GitHub Stars 51.2K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 4.9K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 992	Stacks 117
Followers 1.5K	Followers 217
Votes 673	Votes 65
Pros & Cons
Pros 157 Easy to use and looks elegant 92 Variety of components 64 Themes 61 Has out-of-the-box widgets i would actually use 57 Semantic, duh Cons 5 Outdated build tool (gulp 3)) 3 Poor accessibility support 3 HTML is not semantic (see list component) 2 Javascript is tied to jquery	Pros 13 Fast 11 Swift 10 Type-safe 6 Great for apis 5 Asynchronous Cons 1 Not as much support available. 1 Server side swift is still in its infancy
Integrations
AngularJS React Ember.js Meteor	Swift

What are some alternatives to Semantic UI, Vapor?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Semantic UI vs Vapor: What are the differences?

Grid System: Semantic UI uses a responsive grid system that is based on Flexbox, allowing for more flexibility and control over layout arrangements. On the other hand, Vapor utilizes a similar grid system but has a different implementation that might require adjustments for developers accustomed to Semantic UI's grid structure.
Theming: Semantic UI comes with extensive theming capabilities, allowing users to easily customize the look and feel of their websites. In contrast, Vapor has a more limited theming functionality, which may restrict the level of customization compared to Semantic UI.
Component Library: Semantic UI offers a vast library of components that cover a wide range of UI elements, making it convenient for developers to quickly build websites. In comparison, Vapor has a smaller set of components available, potentially requiring developers to create custom solutions for some UI elements that are readily available in Semantic UI.
JavaScript Integration: Semantic UI provides seamless integration with JavaScript libraries like jQuery, making it easier to enhance interactivity on websites. On the contrary, Vapor may have a different approach to JavaScript integration, requiring developers to adapt their scripting methods when transitioning from Semantic UI.
Documentation: Semantic UI is known for its comprehensive documentation that includes clear examples and guidelines for implementing various features. In contrast, Vapor's documentation may not be as detailed or user-friendly, leading to potential challenges for developers seeking guidance on utilizing the framework effectively.
Community Support: Semantic UI has a robust community of users and contributors that actively engage in forums, provide support, and offer resources for developers. Vapor, being a newer framework, may have a smaller community base, resulting in fewer resources and community-driven solutions available for developers compared to Semantic UI.

In Summary, Semantic UI and Vapor differ in their grid system flexibility, theming capabilities, component libraries, JavaScript integration, documentation quality, and community support.

Semantic UI vs Vapor

Overview