StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache Tomcat vs SignalR

Apache Tomcat vs SignalR

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Stacks16.9K
Followers12.6K
Votes201
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks5.3K
SignalR
SignalR
Stacks656
Followers1.2K
Votes146
GitHub Stars9.3K
Forks2.3K

Apache Tomcat vs SignalR: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Tomcat and SignalR are both widely used technologies for web development. While both serve the purpose of facilitating communication between clients and servers, there are key differences between them that differentiate their functionality and use cases.

  1. Platform and Language Support: Apache Tomcat, also known as Tomcat Server, is primarily used for deploying Java-based web applications. It provides support for Java Servlets, JavaServer Pages (JSP), and Java Expression Language (EL). On the other hand, SignalR is a real-time web application framework developed by Microsoft and supports multiple platforms and languages, including .NET, Java, and Node.js.

  2. Communication Paradigm: The major difference between Apache Tomcat and SignalR lies in their communication paradigms. Tomcat primarily relies on the request-response model, where clients send requests to the server, which then responds with the requested data. SignalR, on the other hand, employs a real-time, bidirectional communication model. It allows for server-to-client and client-to-server communication, enabling real-time updates and push notifications.

  3. Scalability and Performance: Apache Tomcat is well-suited for handling large-scale enterprise-level applications due to its robustness and scalability. It can efficiently manage heavy traffic and handle a high volume of simultaneous requests. SignalR, being a real-time framework, is designed to handle real-time updates and notifications but may not be as scalable as Tomcat for handling a massive number of requests simultaneously.

  4. Supported Protocols: Apache Tomcat supports the standard HTTP and HTTPS protocols, which are commonly used for web communication. SignalR, in addition to HTTP, supports other protocols such as WebSocket, long-polling, and Server-Sent Events (SSE). This allows for efficient real-time communication and fallback mechanisms for various browsers and network environments.

  5. Deployment and Configuration: Apache Tomcat is a full-fledged application server that requires installation and configuration on the server-side. It may involve additional steps, such as configuring server.xml and web.xml files, to deploy web applications on Tomcat. SignalR, on the other hand, is typically integrated into existing web applications and can be deployed without requiring separate server-side deployment or configuration.

  6. Integration with Frameworks and Technologies: Apache Tomcat is often used in conjunction with other Java-based frameworks such as Spring or Struts to build robust and scalable web applications. SignalR, being a framework in itself, integrates seamlessly with various Microsoft technologies and frameworks like ASP.NET and ASP.NET Core.

In summary, Apache Tomcat is a Java-based application server primarily used for deploying Java web applications, providing scalability and support for standard protocols. SignalR is a real-time web application framework with bidirectional communication capabilities, supporting multiple platforms and languages. It excels in real-time updates and push notifications but may not be as scalable as Tomcat for handling a massive number of requests.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache Tomcat, SignalR

Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
SignalR
SignalR

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Stars
9.3K
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
2.3K
Stacks
16.9K
Stacks
656
Followers
12.6K
Followers
1.2K
Votes
201
Votes
146
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 79
    Easy
  • 72
    Java
  • 49
    Popular
  • 1
    Spring web
Cons
  • 3
    Blocking - each http request block a thread
  • 2
    Easy to set up
Pros
  • 32
    Supports .NET server
  • 25
    Real-time
  • 18
    Free
  • 16
    Fallback to SSE, forever frame, long polling
  • 15
    WebSockets
Cons
  • 2
    Expertise hard to get
  • 2
    Requires jQuery
  • 1
    Big differences between ASP.NET and Core versions
  • 1
    Weak iOS and Android support
Integrations
No integrations available
.NET
.NET

What are some alternatives to Apache Tomcat, SignalR?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Ably

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase