StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Skeleton vs Tailwind CSS

Skeleton vs Tailwind CSS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Skeleton
Skeleton
Stacks54
Followers100
Votes24
GitHub Stars19.7K
Forks3.1K
Tailwind CSS
Tailwind CSS
Stacks4.8K
Followers3.1K
Votes245

Skeleton vs Tailwind CSS: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Skeleton and Tailwind CSS.

  1. CSS Class Naming: Skeleton uses simple and intuitive class names that are easy to understand and remember. For example, the class "container" is used to create a container element. On the other hand, Tailwind CSS uses descriptive class names based on its utility-first approach. It provides a wide range of utility classes to create custom styles and designs.

  2. CSS File Size: Skeleton CSS is lightweight and has a smaller file size compared to Tailwind CSS. It focuses on providing a basic set of styling for common elements, resulting in a smaller CSS file. In contrast, Tailwind CSS provides a comprehensive set of utility classes, resulting in a larger CSS file size.

  3. Customization: Skeleton CSS offers limited customization options and relies more on predefined styles. It provides a set of default styles that can be easily overridden if needed. On the other hand, Tailwind CSS allows extensive customization using its utility classes. It provides a range of utility classes to customize almost every aspect of the design, giving developers more control and flexibility.

  4. Flexibility vs Opinionated: Skeleton CSS follows a more opinionated approach where it provides a predefined set of styles and layout options. It focuses on simplicity and ease of use. Tailwind CSS, on the other hand, follows a more flexible approach. It provides a wide range of utility classes that can be combined to create custom styles and layouts. This flexibility allows developers to create highly customized designs.

  5. Availability of Components: Skeleton CSS provides a basic set of styles and components for common UI elements like buttons, forms, and grids. These components are designed to be lightweight and easy to use. Tailwind CSS, on the other hand, does not provide pre-designed components out of the box. It focuses on providing utility classes that can be used to build custom components.

  6. Browser Support: Skeleton CSS supports a wide range of browsers including older versions of Internet Explorer. This makes it suitable for projects that require backward compatibility. Tailwind CSS, on the other hand, does not officially support older versions of Internet Explorer. It focuses on modern and up-to-date browser support.

In summary, Skeleton CSS is a lightweight framework with simpler class names and limited customization options, while Tailwind CSS is a more comprehensive framework with extensive customization options and utility classes for flexible designs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Skeleton, Tailwind CSS

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Syed
Syed

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonBootstrapBootstrapTailwind CSSTailwind CSS

I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.

739k views739k
Comments
Xinyi
Xinyi

Software Developer at DCSIL

Oct 9, 2020

Decided

As our team will be building a web application, HTML5 and CSS3 are one of the standardized combinations to implement the structure and the styling of a webpage. Material-UI comes with all sorts of predesigned web components such as buttons and dropdowns that will save us tons of development time. Since it is a component library designed for React, it suits our needs. However, we do acknowledge that predesigned components may sometimes cause pains especially when it comes to custom styling. To make our life even easier, we also adopted Tailwind CSS. It is a CSS framework providing low-level utility classes that will act as building blocks when we create custom designs.

359k views359k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Skeleton
Skeleton
Tailwind CSS
Tailwind CSS

Skeleton is a small collection of CSS files that can help you rapidly develop sites that look beautiful at any size, be it a 17" laptop screen or an iPhone.

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Responsive Grid Down To Mobile;Fast to Start;Style Agnostic;
No default theme; No build-in UI components; No opinion about how your site should look; Doesn't impose design decisions that you have to fight to undo; Comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with; Or offers a head start implementing a custom design with its own identity
Statistics
GitHub Stars
19.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
54
Stacks
4.8K
Followers
100
Followers
3.1K
Votes
24
Votes
245
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Minimalist
  • 6
    Responsive
  • 4
    Simple
  • 2
    Fantastically straight forward
  • 1
    Lightweight, clean syntax
Cons
  • 0
    Have to make design decisions
Pros
  • 44
    Highly customizable
  • 33
    Quick setup
  • 30
    Utility first styles, its amazing
  • 24
    Versatile
  • 23
    Great docs
Cons
  • 14
    Priced
  • 5
    Cluttered html structure

What are some alternatives to Skeleton, Tailwind CSS?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase