StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Slim vs Spark Framework

Slim vs Spark Framework

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Slim
Slim
Stacks273
Followers391
Votes152
GitHub Stars12.2K
Forks2.0K
Spark Framework
Spark Framework
Stacks39
Followers91
Votes7
GitHub Stars9.7K
Forks1.6K

Slim vs Spark Framework: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between Slim and Spark Framework

Slim and Spark Framework are both micro-frameworks for building web applications, but they have distinct differences that set them apart. Below are some key differences between Slim and Spark Framework:

1. **Routing**: Slim uses a more complex routing system compared to Spark Framework. In Slim, routes are defined more explicitly with route patterns and HTTP methods, while Spark Framework allows for more flexible and simpler routing configurations.
   
2. **Middleware**: Slim provides a wide range of middleware options, making it easier to add additional functionality to your application. On the other hand, Spark Framework has a more limited selection of middleware, focusing on essential features.

3. **Community Support**: Slim has a larger and more active community compared to Spark Framework, which means there are more resources, plugins, and documentation available for Slim users.

4. **Template Engine**: Slim comes with built-in support for multiple template engines, allowing developers to choose the one that best fits their needs. In contrast, Spark Framework has limited template engine support and may require additional configuration to use a different engine.

5. **Dependency Injection**: Slim has a built-in dependency injection container, making it easier to manage dependencies and facilitate testing. Spark Framework, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for dependency injection, requiring developers to implement their own solutions.

6. **Size and Performance**: Slim is known for its lightweight and minimalistic design, making it ideal for smaller projects where performance is crucial. In comparison, Spark Framework may have more overhead due to additional features and dependencies, which could impact performance in high-traffic applications.

In Summary, each of these frameworks has its strengths and weaknesses, with Slim offering more flexibility and control while Spark Framework provides a simpler and more straightforward approach to web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Slim, Spark Framework

Juan José
Juan José

May 1, 2020

Decided

I developed Hexagon heavily inspired in these great tools because of the following reasons:

  • Take full advantage of the Kotlin programming language without any strings attached to Java (as a language).
  • I wanted to be able to replace the HTTP server library used with different adapters (Jetty, Netty, etc.) and though right now there is only one, more are coming.
  • Have a complete tool to do full applications, though you can use other libraries, Hexagon comes with a dependency injection helper, settings loading from different sources and HTTP Client, so it comes with (batteries included).

Right now I'm using it for my pet projects, and I'm happy with it.

35.9k views35.9k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Slim
Slim
Spark Framework
Spark Framework

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

It is a simple and expressive Java/Kotlin web framework DSL built for rapid development. Its intention is to provide an alternative for Kotlin/Java developers that want to develop their web applications as expressive as possible and with minimal boilerplate.

-
Built for productivity; Lets you take full advantage of the JVM
Statistics
GitHub Stars
12.2K
GitHub Stars
9.7K
GitHub Forks
2.0K
GitHub Forks
1.6K
Stacks
273
Stacks
39
Followers
391
Followers
91
Votes
152
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 33
    Microframework
  • 27
    API
  • 22
    Open source
  • 21
    Php
  • 11
    Fast
Pros
  • 2
    Very easy to get up and running. Lovely API
  • 1
    Easy
  • 1
    Native paralelization
  • 1
    Java
  • 1
    Ideal for microservices
Integrations
PHP
PHP
Kotlin
Kotlin
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to Slim, Spark Framework?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase