StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Spring MVC vs Yew Framework

Spring MVC vs Yew Framework

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spring MVC
Spring MVC
Stacks479
Followers519
Votes0
GitHub Stars59.1K
Forks38.8K
Yew Framework
Yew Framework
Stacks24
Followers51
Votes0

Spring MVC vs Yew Framework: What are the differences?

  1. MVC Architecture: Spring MVC follows the Model-View-Controller architecture pattern where the model is responsible for managing the data of the application, the view is responsible for the UI presentation, and the controller acts as an intermediary between the model and the view to process user requests. On the other hand, Yew Framework follows the Elm architecture pattern which is based on functional programming principles.

  2. Language: Spring MVC is written in Java, making it suitable for developers with Java expertise. In contrast, Yew Framework is written in Rust, providing a strong typing system and memory safety features to developers.

  3. Performance: Spring MVC, being a Java-based framework, may have overhead due to the JVM's garbage collection and dynamic nature. Yew Framework, being written in Rust, is known for its high performance as Rust is a systems programming language with a focus on efficiency and speed.

  4. Client-Side Rendering: In Spring MVC, the server typically renders the view and sends it to the client for display. Yew Framework, being a front-end framework, performs client-side rendering where the UI is constructed and updated entirely on the client side without needing to make requests to the server.

  5. Community Support: Spring MVC has a large and established community of developers, resources, and frameworks within the Java ecosystem. Yew Framework, being relatively newer, may have a smaller community compared to Spring MVC, leading to potentially fewer resources and libraries available.

In Summary, Spring MVC and Yew Framework differ in their architecture, language, performance, rendering approach, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Spring MVC
Spring MVC
Yew Framework
Yew Framework

A Java framework that follows the Model-View-Controller design pattern and provides an elegant solution to use MVC in spring framework by the help of DispatcherServlet.

A modern Rust framework inspired by Elm and ReactJS. This framework is designed to be compiled into modern browsers' runtimes: wasm, asm.js, emscripten.

Clear separation of roles; Customizable binding and validation; Adaptability; Flexibility
Compile into modern browsers' runtimes: wasm, asm.js, emscripten; Uses own virtual-dom representation; Put pure Rust code into HTML tags; Use single-line or multi-line Rust comments inside html-templates
Statistics
GitHub Stars
59.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
38.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
479
Stacks
24
Followers
519
Followers
51
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Hibernate
Hibernate
WebAssembly
WebAssembly
Rust
Rust

What are some alternatives to Spring MVC, Yew Framework?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase