StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Stimulus vs Svelte

Stimulus vs Svelte

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Svelte
Svelte
Stacks1.7K
Followers1.6K
Votes502
GitHub Stars84.6K
Forks4.7K
Stimulus
Stimulus
Stacks132
Followers106
Votes16

Stimulus vs Svelte: What are the differences?

  1. 1. Execution Model: Stimulus follows an imperative execution model, where it directly manipulates the DOM based on events and actions. On the other hand, Svelte follows a reactive execution model, where it compiles the code into highly efficient JavaScript, reducing overhead and updating the DOM automatically when the underlying state changes.

  2. 2. Compilation: Stimulus doesn't require any compilation as it directly operates on the existing HTML and JavaScript. In contrast, Svelte requires compilation, as it needs to transpile the code to highly optimized JavaScript during the build process. This compilation step allows Svelte to generate smaller bundle sizes and better performance.

  3. 3. State Management: Stimulus doesn't provide built-in state management capabilities. Instead, it encourages developers to utilize existing JavaScript patterns and libraries for managing state. In contrast, Svelte provides a reactive programming model with built-in state management capabilities, allowing easy and efficient management of application state.

  4. 4. Reactive Components: Stimulus mainly focuses on enhancing individual HTML elements with JavaScript behavior. It does not provide a direct reactive component model. In contrast, Svelte offers a built-in reactive component model where changes to the component's state automatically update the UI, providing a seamless workflow for building interactive components.

  5. 5. Component Compilation: In Stimulus, components are defined as JavaScript classes that extend the base Stimulus controller class. These classes are not compiled or transpiled, and the code remains mostly as-is. In Svelte, components are defined using a dedicated component syntax, which is then compiled to efficient JavaScript during the build process. This compilation allows Svelte to optimize the component's logic and UI updates.

  6. 6. Framework Size: Stimulus is a lightweight framework with a small footprint. It focuses on enhancing existing HTML with JavaScript interactions, making it suitable for smaller projects or projects that already have significant investment in HTML markup. On the other hand, Svelte, while still relatively lightweight, includes a compilation step and a set of built-in features, leading to a slightly larger framework size compared to Stimulus.

In Summary, Stimulus and Svelte differ in their execution models, compilation requirements, state management capabilities, component models, and framework size, with Stimulus following an imperative approach and Svelte following a reactive approach.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Svelte, Stimulus

Máté
Máté

Senior developer at Self-employed

May 28, 2020

Decided

Svelte is everything a developer could ever want for flexible, scalable frontend development. I feel like React has reached a maturity level where there needs to be new syntactic sugar added (I'm looking at you, hooks!). I love how Svelte sets out to rebuild a new language to write interfaces in from the ground up.

311k views311k
Comments
Hampton
Hampton

VP of Engineering at Veue

Oct 4, 2020

Decided

Starting a new company in 2020, with a whole new stack, is a really interesting opportunity for me to look back over the last 20 years of my career with web software and make the right decision for my company.

And, I went with the most radical decision– which is to ignore "sexy" / "hype" technologies almost entirely, and go back to a stack that I first used over 15 years ago.

For my purposes, we are building a video streaming platform, where I wanted rapid customer-facing feature development, high testability, simple scaling, and ease of hiring great, experienced talent. To be clear, our web platform is NOT responsible for handling the actual bits and bytes of the video itself, that's an entirely different stack. It simply needs to manage the business rules and the customers experience of the video content.

I reviewed a lot of different technologies, but none of them seemed to fit the bill as well as Rails did! The hype train had long left the station with Rails, and the community is a little more sparse than it was previously. And, to be honest, Ruby was the language that was easiest for developers, but I find that most languages out there have adopted many of it's innovations for ease of use – or at least corrected their own.

Even with all of that, Rails still seems like the best framework for developing web applications that are no more complex than they need to be. And that's key to me, because it's very easy to go use React and Redux and GraphQL and a whole host of AWS Lamba's to power my blog... but you simply don't actually NEED that.

There are two choices I made in our stack that were new for me personally, and very different than what I would have chosen even 5 years ago.

  1. Postgres - I decided to switch from MySql to Postgres for this project. I wanted to use UUID's instead of numeric primary keys, and knew I'd have a couple places where better JSON/object support would be key. Mysql remains far more popular, but almost every developer I respect has switched and preferred Postgres with a strong passion. It's not "sexy" but it's considered "better".

  2. Stimulus.js - This was definitely the biggest and wildest choice to make. Stimulus is a Javascript framework by my old friend Sam Stephenson (Prototype.js, rbenv, turbolinks) and DHH, and it is a sort of radical declaration that your Javascript in the browser can be both powerful and modern AND simple. It leans heavily on the belief that HTML-is-good and that data-* attributes are good. It focuses on the actions and interactions and not on the rendering aspects. It took me a while to wrap my head around, and I still have to remind myself, that server-side-HTML is how you solve many problems with this stack, and avoid trying to re-render things just in the browser. So far, I'm happy with this choice, but it is definitely a radical departure from the current trends.

471k views471k
Comments
Raj
Raj

Oct 10, 2020

Review

It purely depends on your app needs. Does it need to be scalable, do you have lots of features, OR it is a simple project with very simple needs - many of those parameters clarify which technologies will fit.

If you are looking for a quick solution, that reduces lot of development time, take a look at postgraphile (https://www.graphile.org/postgraphile/). You have to just define the schema and you get the entire graph-ql apis built for you and you can just focus on your frontend.

On frontend, React is good, but also need to remember that it is popular because it introduced one way data writes and in-built virtual dom + diffing to determine which dom to modify. Though personally I liked it, am recently more inclined to Svelte because its lightweightedness and absence of virtual dom and its simplicity compared to the huge ecosystem that React has surrounded itself with.

In all situations, frameworks keep changing over time. What is best today is not considered even good few years from now. What is important is to have the logic in a separate, clean manner void of too many framework related dependencies - that way you can switch one framework with another very easily.

3.76k views3.76k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Svelte
Svelte
Stimulus
Stimulus

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Stimulus is a JavaScript framework with modest ambitions. It doesn't seek to take over your entire front-end—in fact, it's not concerned with rendering HTML at all.

Write less code; No virtual DOM; Truly reactive
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
84.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.7K
Stacks
132
Followers
1.6K
Followers
106
Votes
502
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 59
    Performance
  • 41
    Reactivity
  • 36
    Components
  • 35
    Simplicity
  • 34
    Javascript compiler (do that browsers don't have to)
Cons
  • 3
    Event Listener Overload
  • 2
    Complex
  • 2
    Hard to learn
  • 2
    Little to no libraries
  • 2
    Learning Curve
Pros
  • 5
    No Javascript on Backend
  • 5
    Simple and easy to start with
  • 4
    Balance between Front End and BackEnd
  • 2
    Easy way to add functionality to rails views
Cons
  • 2
    Steep learning curve
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Svelte, Stimulus?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase