StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Supersonic vs UXCam

Supersonic vs UXCam

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Supersonic
Supersonic
Stacks2
Followers15
Votes0
UXCam
UXCam
Stacks23
Followers32
Votes2

Supersonic vs UXCam: What are the differences?

Introduction

Supersonic and UXCam are two popular tools used for app performance monitoring and user experience optimization in the mobile application development space.

  1. Data Collection: Supersonic primarily focuses on collecting data about app usage, crash reports, and performance metrics. On the other hand, UXCam offers more comprehensive data collection capabilities by recording user sessions, heatmaps, and gestures to provide a detailed view of user interactions with the app.

  2. Analytics and Reporting: While Supersonic provides basic analytics and reporting features such as tracking app launches, session duration, and retention rates, UXCam offers advanced analytics that include user segmentation, conversion funnels, and A/B testing capabilities for in-depth analysis of user behavior and app performance.

  3. User Feedback: UXCam stands out in providing tools for collecting direct user feedback through in-app surveys, NPS (Net Promoter Score) surveys, and feedback forms. Supersonic, on the other hand, does not offer direct user feedback gathering features.

  4. Integration with Development Tools: Supersonic is more integrated with app development tools like Firebase and Fabric, allowing developers to streamline the process of monitoring app performance and making improvements. In comparison, UXCam provides seamless integration with popular development platforms such as Android Studio and Xcode for efficient implementation of user experience optimization strategies.

  5. Real-time Monitoring: UXCam offers real-time monitoring capabilities, enabling developers to track user interactions as they happen and make immediate adjustments to improve user experience. Supersonic, while providing real-time data updates, focuses more on performance metrics rather than user behavior analysis in real-time.

  6. Cost and Pricing: Supersonic offers a free version with limited features and paid plans based on the number of active users, whereas UXCam follows a subscription-based pricing model that includes different tiers based on the level of features and support required.

In Summary, Supersonic and UXCam differ in their data collection methods, analytics capabilities, user feedback tools, integration with development platforms, real-time monitoring features, and pricing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Supersonic
Supersonic
UXCam
UXCam

Supersonic UI is a game-changer. It's an Ionic fork that changes the way you think about hybrid app performance. Supersonic's declarative UI style makes building complex mobile apps a breeze. In the background, the seamless interplay of native UI and HTML5 bakes an end-result that is 100% indistinguishable from any native app.

UXCam automatically records all events in your app, providing insights into user behavior and helping you solve problems that users encounter.

Mobile-first CSS components;Native UI components, with CSS styling;Declarative UI;AngularJS Directives;SPA navigation with AngularJS;Support for other frameworks than AngularJS
Screen and camera recordings;Physical interactions;User engagement data;Contextualized data;Navigation flows;Touch heat maps
Statistics
Stacks
2
Stacks
23
Followers
15
Followers
32
Votes
0
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 1
    Magnificent customer support
  • 1
    Security GDPR design
Integrations
No integrations available
Android SDK
Android SDK
Cocoa Touch (iOS)
Cocoa Touch (iOS)

What are some alternatives to Supersonic, UXCam?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase