Tailwind CSS vs Water.css

Overview

Tailwind CSS

Stacks4.8K

Followers3.1K

Votes245

Water.css

Stacks6

Followers24

Votes0

GitHub Stars8.6K

Forks502

Tailwind CSS vs Water.css: What are the differences?

Customization: Tailwind CSS provides extensive customization options by allowing you to configure every aspect of your design using utility classes. On the other hand, Water.css is designed to be minimalist and lightweight, offering limited customization options to maintain simplicity and ease of use.
File Size: Tailwind CSS has a larger file size due to its comprehensive set of utility classes and features, making it more suitable for complex projects that require extensive customization. In contrast, Water.css is ultra-lightweight with a very small file size, making it ideal for simple, fast-loading websites or projects where minimal styling is needed.
Design Philosophy: Tailwind CSS follows a utility-first approach, where styles are applied directly in the HTML markup using utility classes. Water.css, on the other hand, adheres to a more traditional CSS approach, with predefined styles that can be easily added to your HTML elements without the need for additional classes.
Community and Support: Tailwind CSS has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources available. Water.css, while growing in popularity, may have a smaller community and fewer resources for troubleshooting and assistance.
Learning Curve: Tailwind CSS has a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its unique utility class system and extensive customization options. Water.css, on the other hand, is more beginner-friendly with its simple and straightforward approach to styling, making it easier to grasp for those new to CSS frameworks.
Browser Support: Tailwind CSS is compatible with all modern browsers, but may require additional setup or polyfills for older browsers. Water.css is designed to be fully compatible with all major browsers out of the box, ensuring consistent styling across different platforms without the need for extra configurations.

In Summary, Tailwind CSS offers extensive customization options and is suitable for complex projects, while Water.css is minimalist and lightweight, making it ideal for simple, fast-loading websites with limited styling needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Tailwind CSS, Water.css

Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k

Comments

Syed

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

Bootstrap

Tailwind CSS

I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.

739k views739k

Comments

Sai Karun

Jan 30, 2020

Needs advice

We are re-modifying the existing portal to the new one. Looking out for a CSS framework where over-rides are possible, the performance of page loading, extendable, etc Please suggest between tailwind, UIkit and bootstrap frameworks explaining in detail on different factors. I request your help on the same.

595k views595k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Tailwind CSS	Water.css
Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.	A css framework that doesn't require any classes. You just include it in your <head> and forget about it, while it silently makes everything nicer.
No default theme; No build-in UI components; No opinion about how your site should look; Doesn't impose design decisions that you have to fight to undo; Comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with; Or offers a head start implementing a custom design with its own identity	Responsive; Modern browser support; Small size (< 2kb); Beautiful; No classes;
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 8.6K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 502
Stacks 4.8K	Stacks 6
Followers 3.1K	Followers 24
Votes 245	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 44 Highly customizable 33 Quick setup 30 Utility first styles, its amazing 24 Versatile 23 Great docs Cons 14 Priced 5 Cluttered html structure	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	jsDelivr Replit

What are some alternatives to Tailwind CSS, Water.css?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

Tailwind CSS vs Water.css: What are the differences?

Customization: Tailwind CSS provides extensive customization options by allowing you to configure every aspect of your design using utility classes. On the other hand, Water.css is designed to be minimalist and lightweight, offering limited customization options to maintain simplicity and ease of use.
File Size: Tailwind CSS has a larger file size due to its comprehensive set of utility classes and features, making it more suitable for complex projects that require extensive customization. In contrast, Water.css is ultra-lightweight with a very small file size, making it ideal for simple, fast-loading websites or projects where minimal styling is needed.
Design Philosophy: Tailwind CSS follows a utility-first approach, where styles are applied directly in the HTML markup using utility classes. Water.css, on the other hand, adheres to a more traditional CSS approach, with predefined styles that can be easily added to your HTML elements without the need for additional classes.
Community and Support: Tailwind CSS has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources available. Water.css, while growing in popularity, may have a smaller community and fewer resources for troubleshooting and assistance.
Learning Curve: Tailwind CSS has a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its unique utility class system and extensive customization options. Water.css, on the other hand, is more beginner-friendly with its simple and straightforward approach to styling, making it easier to grasp for those new to CSS frameworks.
Browser Support: Tailwind CSS is compatible with all modern browsers, but may require additional setup or polyfills for older browsers. Water.css is designed to be fully compatible with all major browsers out of the box, ensuring consistent styling across different platforms without the need for extra configurations.

Tailwind CSS vs Water.css

Overview