StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Realtime Code Collaboration
  5. Teletype for Atom vs Visual Studio Live Share

Teletype for Atom vs Visual Studio Live Share

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Teletype for Atom
Teletype for Atom
Stacks40
Followers64
Votes2
GitHub Stars2.4K
Forks325
Visual Studio Live Share
Visual Studio Live Share
Stacks192
Followers272
Votes17

Teletype for Atom vs Visual Studio Live Share: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Teletype for Atom and Visual Studio Live Share

Teletype for Atom and Visual Studio Live Share are both collaboration extensions that allow developers to code together in real-time. However, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Installation and Compatibility: Teletype for Atom is built specifically for the Atom text editor, whereas Visual Studio Live Share is a feature of the Visual Studio IDE. Teletype can be used on any operating system supported by Atom, whereas Live Share is primarily designed for Windows but also supports macOS and Linux.

  2. Collaboration Modes: Teletype for Atom primarily focuses on shared editing, allowing multiple users to work on the same file simultaneously. It provides a "host" and "guest" concept where the host shares their workspace and the guest joins it. On the other hand, Visual Studio Live Share offers a broader range of collaboration features including shared debugging, terminals, and server forwarding, in addition to shared editing.

  3. Guest Access: Teletype for Atom does not require guest users to have the extension installed. They can access the collaboration session through a unique URL shared by the host. In contrast, Visual Studio Live Share requires all participants to have the extension installed in their respective IDEs in order to collaborate.

  4. Security Model: Teletype for Atom uses end-to-end encryption when sharing code, ensuring that only authorized participants can see the content. Visual Studio Live Share also provides a secure connection, but the specifics of its security model are less transparent and may rely on the security measures of the underlying Visual Studio IDE and its remote server.

  5. Supported Languages and Frameworks: Both Teletype for Atom and Visual Studio Live Share support multiple programming languages, but Visual Studio Live Share has broader support for various frameworks and tools. It offers features like language services, IntelliSense, and debugging for a wide range of languages and frameworks, which may provide a more streamlined collaborative development experience.

  6. Integration with Other Tools: Visual Studio Live Share integrates seamlessly with other Visual Studio extensions and tools. It leverages the rich ecosystem of Visual Studio, allowing users to work with their preferred extensions and customizations. Teletype for Atom, being a standalone extension, may have limited integration capabilities with external tools and extensions.

In Summary, Teletype for Atom and Visual Studio Live Share differ in terms of installation and compatibility, collaboration modes, guest access, security model, language and framework support, and integration with other tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Teletype for Atom, Visual Studio Live Share

Cameron
Cameron

CEO at NewCraft

Sep 5, 2020

Needs adviceonGitDuckGitDuck

We're doing weekend hackathons with customers to help them implement our API faster. So, I'm searching for a great remote pair programming tool with seamless onboarding/set-up. Want it to be as close to a Collison Install ("hand me your laptop, and I'll install Stripe right now") experience as possible.

Has anyone used GitDuck, Tuple, etc. for something like this? I would love suggestions.

9.97k views9.97k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Teletype for Atom
Teletype for Atom
Visual Studio Live Share
Visual Studio Live Share

Teletype introduces the concept of real-time "portals" for sharing workspaces. When a host opens a portal, their active tab becomes a shared workspace. There, invited collaborators can join in and make edits in real time. As the host moves between files, collaborators follow along with the active tab automatically.

When you start a live share session in Visual Studio 2017 or Visual Studio Code, your teammates get instant and secure access to your code in their own tool – no need to clone, copy, or configure anything.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
325
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
40
Stacks
192
Followers
64
Followers
272
Votes
2
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    GitHub Integration
Pros
  • 4
    Terminal sharing
  • 3
    Port sharing
  • 3
    Server sharing
  • 2
    IntelliSense Completion
  • 2
    Real-time
Cons
  • 1
    No Read Only sharing
Integrations
Atom
Atom
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio
Visual Studio

What are some alternatives to Teletype for Atom, Visual Studio Live Share?

GitDuck

GitDuck

GitDuck enables you to talk and collaborate in real-time by sharing your code and terminal on a video call.

AtomPair

AtomPair

Remote pairing within the Atom.IO text editor, powered by Pusher.

Pop.com

Pop.com

Work together like you’re in the same room. Blazing-fast screen sharing, multiplayer control, crystal-clear voice and high-quality video. It is perfect for pair programming. Supports Mac, Windows, Linux, Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and mobile browsers.

Convergence

Convergence

It is an engine for real-time collaboration. Out of the box, it includes everything a developer would need to add real-time co-editing functionality to any web application.

Promyze

Promyze

It is a collaborative solution to define and share best coding practices for developers' teams. It helps teams of developers, communities of practices, or any technical teams to decide together the most appropriate practices in their context. The IDE and Web browsers plugins are useful to identify best practices (followed or not in their code), and to get suggestions while developers are coding.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana