Tornado vs Vert.x

Overview

Tornado

Stacks530

Followers409

Votes167

GitHub Stars22.3K

Forks5.5K

Vert.x

Stacks259

Followers325

Votes59

Tornado vs Vert.x: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Concurrency Model: Tornado uses a single-threaded model with non-blocking I/O, while Vert.x is built on a multi-threaded and event-driven architecture which allows for efficient utilization of multi-core CPUs.
Programming Language: Tornado is primarily designed for Python, whereas Vert.x supports multiple languages, including Java, Kotlin, Ruby, Groovy, and JavaScript. This provides developers with more flexibility in choosing the language they are most comfortable with.
Clustering Support: Vert.x offers built-in clustering support out of the box, enabling seamless scaling of applications across multiple nodes, while Tornado lacks native clustering capabilities and may require additional effort to achieve similar scalability.
Asynchronous Programming: Vert.x heavily emphasizes asynchronous programming patterns, making it a suitable choice for building high-performance, reactive applications, whereas Tornado supports both synchronous and asynchronous programming styles, offering a more flexible approach to developers.
Ecosystem and Community: Vert.x has a larger and more diverse ecosystem with extensive libraries and community support for various languages, frameworks, and tools, making it easier for developers to find resources and solutions, whereas Tornado has a comparatively smaller ecosystem focused primarily on Python development.
Integration with Other Systems: Vert.x provides seamless integration with a wide range of systems and technologies through its event bus and module system, allowing for easier communication and interoperability between different components, while Tornado may require more manual integration efforts in certain cases due to its design limitations.

In Summary, Vert.x and Tornado differ in their concurrency model, language support, clustering capabilities, asynchronous programming emphasis, ecosystem diversity, and integration options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Tornado	Vert.x
By using non-blocking network I/O, Tornado can scale to tens of thousands of open connections, making it ideal for long polling, WebSockets, and other applications that require a long-lived connection to each user.	It is event driven and non blocking application framework. This means your app can handle a lot of concurrency using a small number of kernel threads. It lets your app scale with minimal hardware.
-	polygot; Simple concurrency model
Statistics
GitHub Stars 22.3K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 5.5K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 530	Stacks 259
Followers 409	Followers 325
Votes 167	Votes 59
Pros & Cons
Pros 37 Open source 31 So fast 27 Great for microservices architecture 20 Websockets 17 Simple Cons 2 Event loop is complicated	Pros 13 Light weight 12 Fast 8 Java 6 Developers Are Super 5 Extensible Cons 2 Steep Learning Curve 2 Too Many Conflicting Versions And Suggestions
Integrations
Python	JavaScript Ruby Java Kotlin Groovy

What are some alternatives to Tornado, Vert.x?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Tornado vs Vert.x: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

Concurrency Model: Tornado uses a single-threaded model with non-blocking I/O, while Vert.x is built on a multi-threaded and event-driven architecture which allows for efficient utilization of multi-core CPUs.
Programming Language: Tornado is primarily designed for Python, whereas Vert.x supports multiple languages, including Java, Kotlin, Ruby, Groovy, and JavaScript. This provides developers with more flexibility in choosing the language they are most comfortable with.
Clustering Support: Vert.x offers built-in clustering support out of the box, enabling seamless scaling of applications across multiple nodes, while Tornado lacks native clustering capabilities and may require additional effort to achieve similar scalability.
Asynchronous Programming: Vert.x heavily emphasizes asynchronous programming patterns, making it a suitable choice for building high-performance, reactive applications, whereas Tornado supports both synchronous and asynchronous programming styles, offering a more flexible approach to developers.
Ecosystem and Community: Vert.x has a larger and more diverse ecosystem with extensive libraries and community support for various languages, frameworks, and tools, making it easier for developers to find resources and solutions, whereas Tornado has a comparatively smaller ecosystem focused primarily on Python development.
Integration with Other Systems: Vert.x provides seamless integration with a wide range of systems and technologies through its event bus and module system, allowing for easier communication and interoperability between different components, while Tornado may require more manual integration efforts in certain cases due to its design limitations.

In Summary, Vert.x and Tornado differ in their concurrency model, language support, clustering capabilities, asynchronous programming emphasis, ecosystem diversity, and integration options.

Tornado vs Vert.x

Overview