StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Total.js vs TypeORM

Total.js vs TypeORM

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Total.js
Total.js
Stacks20
Followers62
Votes37
GitHub Stars4.4K
Forks446
TypeORM
TypeORM
Stacks756
Followers813
Votes81
GitHub Stars36.0K
Forks6.5K

TypeORM vs Total.js: What are the differences?

Developers describe TypeORM as "An ORM that can run in NodeJS and others". It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way. On the other hand, Total.js is detailed as "Framework for creating rich web sites, web applications, e-commerce and real-time applications". It is a Framework for Node.js platfrom written in pure JavaScript similar to PHP's Laravel or Python's Django or ASP.NET MVC.

TypeORM and Total.js can be primarily classified as "Microframeworks (Backend)" tools.

Some of the features offered by TypeORM are:

  • automatically create the database table schemes based on your models
  • transparently insert / update / delete to the database your objects
  • map your selections from tables to JavaScript objects and map table columns to object properties

On the other hand, Total.js provides the following key features:

  • Super fast development
  • Extremely low maintenance costs
  • Rock solid stability

TypeORM and Total.js are both open source tools. TypeORM with 14.7K GitHub stars and 1.93K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Total.js with 3.97K GitHub stars and 434 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Total.js
Total.js
TypeORM
TypeORM

It is a Framework for Node.js platfrom written in pure JavaScript similar to PHP's Laravel or Python's Django or ASP.NET MVC

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Super fast development; Extremely low maintenance costs; Rock solid stability; Incredible performance; Easy scaling
automatically create the database table schemes based on your models; transparently insert / update / delete to the database your objects; map your selections from tables to JavaScript objects and map table columns to object properties; easily create one-to-one, many-to-one, one-to-many and many-to-many relations between tables; and much more.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
4.4K
GitHub Stars
36.0K
GitHub Forks
446
GitHub Forks
6.5K
Stacks
20
Stacks
756
Followers
62
Followers
813
Votes
37
Votes
81
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Fast
  • 5
    Rapid development
  • 4
    Great support
  • 4
    Low-code tools
  • 3
    Npm
Cons
  • 3
    Lack of source code documentation
  • 2
    Poor design - 4000 line files
  • 2
    Messes up global namespace and default prototypes
  • 2
    Poor community
  • 2
    Poor design
Pros
  • 30
    Typescript
  • 12
    Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, SQLite, MS SQL Ser
  • 9
    Cons of TypeORM
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 7
    Works in NodeJS, Browser, Ionic, Cordova and Electron p
Cons
  • 5
    Completely abandoned by its creator
  • 3
    Too complex for what it does
  • 2
    Doesn't really support native javascript
  • 1
    Cannot use query on any relation
  • 1
    Not proper/real type safety
Integrations
npm
npm
Node.js
Node.js
PostGraphile
PostGraphile
Sentry
Sentry
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Total.js, TypeORM?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase