StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Vue Material vs vue-next

Vue Material vs vue-next

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

vue-next
vue-next
Stacks12
Followers14
Votes0
Vue Material
Vue Material
Stacks4
Followers9
Votes0
GitHub Stars9.9K
Forks1.1K

Vue Material vs vue-next: What are the differences?

### Introduction

Vue Material and vue-next are both popular libraries used for building user interfaces in Vue.js applications. While they may seem similar at first glance, there are key differences that developers should consider before choosing one over the other.

1. **Component Library**: Vue Material is a comprehensive UI component library that offers a wide range of ready-to-use components such as buttons, cards, and menus with Material Design styles. On the other hand, vue-next provides the core functionality for Vue 3, focusing more on the Vue framework itself rather than pre-designed UI components.
   
2. **Documentation and Community Support**: Vue Material has detailed documentation and an active community that provides support and resources for developers using the library. In contrast, vue-next being the core Vue 3 library, may have less extensive documentation and community support compared to Vue Material.
   
3. **Customization and Flexibility**: Vue Material comes with predefined Material Design styles and components, making it easy to maintain a consistent look and feel throughout an application. On the contrary, vue-next provides more flexibility and freedom for developers to customize the UI according to their specific requirements without being limited to Material Design guidelines.
   
4. **Performance Optimizations**: Vue Material is optimized for performance with pre-built components and styles, ensuring smooth rendering and efficient usage of resources. In comparison, vue-next focuses on core Vue functionality, allowing developers to implement performance optimizations specific to their application needs.
   
5. **Compatibility with Vue Versions**: Vue Material is compatible with Vue 2, which may be preferred for developers working on existing Vue 2 projects. Conversely, vue-next is designed for Vue 3, taking advantage of its features and improvements, making it a suitable choice for projects utilizing the latest version of Vue.

6. **Ease of Migration**: Transitioning from Vue Material to vue-next or vice versa may present challenges due to differences in component structure, API usage, and styling approaches. Therefore, developers should carefully evaluate the ease of migration based on their project requirements and existing codebase.

In Summary, understanding the distinctions between Vue Material and vue-next is crucial for selecting the most suitable library that aligns with your project needs and development preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

vue-next
vue-next
Vue Material
Vue Material

It is the next major version of Vue. It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

It is Simple, lightweight and built exactly according to the Google Material Design specs Build well-designed apps that can fit on every screen with support to all modern Web Browsers with dynamic themes, components on demand and all with an ease-to-use API.

Next major version of Vue; Single-File Component support; Support for vue-router; Support for vuex; Support for vue-cli; Support for vue-test-utils
Simple, lightweight and built exactly according to the Google Material Design specs; Build well-designed apps that can fit on every screen with support for all modern Web Browsers; Complete with dynamic themes, on-demand components and all with an easy-to-use API
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
9.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
12
Stacks
4
Followers
14
Followers
9
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Vue CLI
Vue CLI
vuex
vuex
Vue Router
Vue Router
Vue.js
Vue.js

What are some alternatives to vue-next, Vue Material?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase