Willow vs Zap

Overview

Willow Logging

Stacks5

Followers11

Votes0

GitHub Stars1.4K

Forks80

Zap

Stacks10

Followers33

Votes0

GitHub Stars23.9K

Forks1.5K

Willow vs Zap: What are the differences?

Developers describe Willow as "A powerful, yet lightweight logging library written in Swift, by Nike". Willow is a powerful, yet lightweight logging library written in Swift. On the other hand, Zap is detailed as "Blazing fast, structured, leveled logging in Go (by Uber)". Zap takes a different approach. It includes a reflection-free, zero-allocation JSON encoder, and the base Logger strives to avoid serialization overhead and allocations wherever possible. By building the high-level SugaredLogger on that foundation, zap lets users choose when they need to count every allocation and when they'd prefer a more familiar, loosely typed API.

Willow and Zap can be categorized as "Logging" tools.

Willow and Zap are both open source tools. Zap with 7.22K GitHub stars and 553 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Willow with 1.13K GitHub stars and 61 GitHub forks.

🔥 Trending in Log Management on StackShare

Logstash

Log Management

Collect, Parse, & Enrich Data

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

8.77k

Detailed Comparison

Willow Logging	Zap
Willow is a powerful, yet lightweight logging library written in Swift.	Zap takes a different approach. It includes a reflection-free, zero-allocation JSON encoder, and the base Logger strives to avoid serialization overhead and allocations wherever possible. By building the high-level SugaredLogger on that foundation, zap lets users choose when they need to count every allocation and when they'd prefer a more familiar, loosely typed API.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 1.4K	GitHub Stars 23.9K
GitHub Forks 80	GitHub Forks 1.5K
Stacks 5	Stacks 10
Followers 11	Followers 33
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	Golang

What are some alternatives to Willow Logging, Zap?

Seq

Seq is a self-hosted server for structured log search, analysis, and alerting. It can be hosted on Windows or Linux/Docker, and has integrations for most popular structured logging libraries.

Loki

Loki is a horizontally-scalable, highly-available, multi-tenant log aggregation system inspired by Prometheus. It is designed to be very cost effective and easy to operate, as it does not index the contents of the logs, but rather a set of labels for each log stream.

Log4j

It is an open source logging framework. With this tool – logging behavior can be controlled by editing a configuration file only without touching the application binary and can be used to store the Selenium Automation flow logs.

Castle Core

It provides common Castle Project abstractions including logging services. It also features Castle DynamicProxy a lightweight runtime proxy generator, and Castle DictionaryAdapter.

Bunyan

It is a simple and fast JSON logging module for node.js services. It has extensible streams system for controlling where log records go (to a stream, to a file, log file rotation, etc.)

Fluent Bit

It is a super fast, lightweight, and highly scalable logging and metrics processor and forwarder. It is the preferred choice for cloud and containerized environments.

CocoaLumberjack

CocoaLumberjack is a fast & simple, yet powerful & flexible logging framework for Mac and iOS.

uno

We built uno, a small tool similar to uniq (the UNIX CLI tool that removes duplicates) - but with fuzziness. uno considers two lines to be equal if their edit distance is less than a specified threshold, by default set to 30%. It reads from stdin and prints the deduplicated lines to stdout.

NanoLog

It is an extremely performant nanosecond scale logging system for C++ that exposes a simple printf-like API and achieves over 80 million logs/second at a median latency of just over 7 nanoseconds.

SwiftyBeaver

It is Swift-based logging framework for iOS and macOS. It has different types of log messages where also we can filter logs to make bug checking even easier and has a free license plan.