StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Svelte vs T3

Svelte vs T3

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

T3
T3
Stacks28
Followers39
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.5K
Forks145
Svelte
Svelte
Stacks1.7K
Followers1.6K
Votes502
GitHub Stars84.6K
Forks4.7K

Svelte vs T3: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Svelte and T3 are both popular front-end frameworks that have gained popularity in the web development community. While they share some similarities, they also have key differences that set them apart from each other.

1. **Component Architecture**: Svelte uses a component-based architecture where components are created as standalone entities with their encapsulated logic and styles. In contrast, T3 follows a modular approach where components are built by combining modules, making it more flexible in terms of reusability.

2. **Virtual DOM Handling**: Svelte compiles the component code to highly efficient vanilla JavaScript at build time, eliminating the need for a virtual DOM. This results in faster initial load times and better runtime performance. On the other hand, T3 uses a virtual DOM for diffing and updating the actual DOM, which can lead to slightly slower performance compared to Svelte.

3. **Reactivity System**: Svelte features a reactive system where data bindings are automatically updated when the underlying data changes, making it easy to manage state without writing additional code. T3, on the other hand, requires explicit state management through hooks or context API, providing more control but requiring more boilerplate code.

4. **Bundle Size**: Svelte generates smaller bundle sizes compared to T3 due to its compile-time approach. This can result in faster load times for Svelte applications, especially on low-bandwidth or mobile devices where minimizing bundle size is crucial for optimal performance.

5. **Learning Curve**: Svelte is known for its simplicity and ease of use, with a gentle learning curve that makes it accessible to beginners. T3, while powerful, has a steeper learning curve due to its more robust feature set and complex configurations, making it better suited for experienced developers.

6. **Community and Ecosystem**: Svelte has a growing community and ecosystem with a range of plugins and tools to enhance developer productivity. T3, being a newer framework, has a smaller community and ecosystem, which may limit the availability of resources and support for developers using the framework.

In Summary, Svelte and T3 differ in terms of their component architecture, virtual DOM handling, reactivity system, bundle size, learning curve, and community ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on T3, Svelte

Máté
Máté

Senior developer at Self-employed

May 28, 2020

Decided

Svelte is everything a developer could ever want for flexible, scalable frontend development. I feel like React has reached a maturity level where there needs to be new syntactic sugar added (I'm looking at you, hooks!). I love how Svelte sets out to rebuild a new language to write interfaces in from the ground up.

311k views311k
Comments
Raj
Raj

Oct 10, 2020

Review

It purely depends on your app needs. Does it need to be scalable, do you have lots of features, OR it is a simple project with very simple needs - many of those parameters clarify which technologies will fit.

If you are looking for a quick solution, that reduces lot of development time, take a look at postgraphile (https://www.graphile.org/postgraphile/). You have to just define the schema and you get the entire graph-ql apis built for you and you can just focus on your frontend.

On frontend, React is good, but also need to remember that it is popular because it introduced one way data writes and in-built virtual dom + diffing to determine which dom to modify. Though personally I liked it, am recently more inclined to Svelte because its lightweightedness and absence of virtual dom and its simplicity compared to the huge ecosystem that React has surrounded itself with.

In all situations, frameworks keep changing over time. What is best today is not considered even good few years from now. What is important is to have the logic in a separate, clean manner void of too many framework related dependencies - that way you can switch one framework with another very easily.

3.76k views3.76k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Full-stack software engineer

Apr 25, 2020

Decided

Svelte 3 is exacly what I'm looking for that Vue is not made for.

It has a iterable dom just like angular but very low overhead.

This is going to be used with the application.

for old/ lite devices . ie.

  • android tv,
  • micro linux,
  • possibly text based web browser for ascci and/or linux framebuffer
  • android go devices
  • android One devices
125k views125k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

T3
T3
Svelte
Svelte

T3 is different than most JavaScript frameworks. It's meant to be a small piece of an overall architecture that allows you to build scalable client-side code. T3 is explicitly not an MVC framework. It's a framework that allows the creation of loosely-coupled components while letting you decide what other pieces you need for your web application. You can use T3 with other frameworks like Backbone or React, or you can use T3 by itself.

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

-
Write less code; No virtual DOM; Truly reactive
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.5K
GitHub Stars
84.6K
GitHub Forks
145
GitHub Forks
4.7K
Stacks
28
Stacks
1.7K
Followers
39
Followers
1.6K
Votes
0
Votes
502
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 59
    Performance
  • 41
    Reactivity
  • 36
    Components
  • 35
    Simplicity
  • 34
    Javascript compiler (do that browsers don't have to)
Cons
  • 3
    Event Listener Overload
  • 2
    Little to no libraries
  • 2
    Hard to learn
  • 2
    Learning Curve
  • 2
    Complex

What are some alternatives to T3, Svelte?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase