What is Tailwind UI and what are its top alternatives?
Tailwind UI is a comprehensive library of fully designed components that work seamlessly with Tailwind CSS, allowing developers to quickly build modern web interfaces. Its key features include a wide range of customizable and reusable components, responsive design, easy integration with Tailwind CSS, and thorough documentation. However, a limitation of Tailwind UI is its paid pricing model, which might not be viable for all projects.
- Bootstrap: Bootstrap is a popular HTML, CSS, and JavaScript framework for developing responsive and mobile-first websites. Key features include a grid system, responsive utilities, and a vast library of pre-designed components. Pros of Bootstrap include its extensive documentation and large community support, but it may be less customizable compared to Tailwind UI.
- Bulma: Bulma is a modern CSS framework based on Flexbox that offers a clean and modular design approach. It features a flexible grid system, customizable elements, and is easy to learn and use. Pros of Bulma include its lightweight nature and flexibility, but it may have a smaller community and fewer pre-built components compared to Tailwind UI.
- Materialize: Materialize is a responsive front-end framework based on Google's Material Design guidelines. It includes a grid system, CSS components, and JavaScript plugins for interactive elements. Pros of Materialize include its modern design aesthetics and easy integration of material design principles, but it may not offer as much customization compared to Tailwind UI.
- Foundation: Foundation is a responsive front-end framework that provides a mobile-first approach to web design. It offers a grid system, Sass support, and a range of customizable components. Pros of Foundation include its focus on accessibility and flexibility, but it may have a steeper learning curve compared to Tailwind UI.
- Semantic UI: Semantic UI is a development framework that uses human-friendly HTML to build responsive and user-friendly layouts. It features a wide range of UI components, theming options, and easy integration with other libraries. Pros of Semantic UI include its intuitive syntax and easy customization, but it may not have as many ready-made components as Tailwind UI.
- UIKit: UIKit is a lightweight and modular front-end framework for developing fast and powerful web interfaces. It includes a grid system, components library, and animations for interactive elements. Pros of UIKit include its modern design elements and flexibility, but it may require some additional configuration compared to Tailwind UI.
- Spectre.css: Spectre.css is a lightweight and responsive CSS framework that includes a grid system, components, and utilities for building modern websites. Pros of Spectre.css include its simplicity and minimalistic design, but it may not offer as many advanced features as Tailwind UI.
- Tailwind CSS: Tailwind CSS is a utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom designs. It offers a low-level utility class-based approach for styling elements and allows for highly customizable designs. Pros of Tailwind CSS include its flexibility and efficiency in styling components, but it may require more manual tweaking compared to Tailwind UI.
- Ant Design: Ant Design is a design system that provides a set of React components that follow the principles of Ant Design. It offers a wide range of customizable and interactive UI elements for building sophisticated web applications. Pros of Ant Design include its comprehensive component library and consistent design language, but it may be more opinionated in terms of design compared to Tailwind UI.
- Chakra UI: Chakra UI is a simple and modular component library for building accessible and ergonomic web interfaces using React. It offers a range of customizable and responsive components to speed up development. Pros of Chakra UI include its flexibility and accessibility features, but it may have a smaller component library compared to Tailwind UI.
Top Alternatives to Tailwind UI
Material-UIMaterial UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design. ...
IoniconsPremium designed icons for use in web, iOS, Android, and desktop apps. Support for SVG and web font. Completely open source and MIT licensed. ...
Ant DesignAn enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework. ...
Chakra UIIt is a simple, modular and accessible component library that gives you all the building blocks you need to build your React applications. ...
DevExtremeFrom Angular and React, to ASP.NET Core or Vue, it includes a comprehensive collection of high-performance and responsive UI widgets for use in traditional web and next-gen mobile applications. The suite ships with a feature-complete data grid, interactive charts widgets, data editors, and much more. ...
ElementUIIt is not focused on Mobile development, mainly because it lacks responsiveness on mobile WebViews. ...
FeathersBuild mobile & desktop games and apps with fully-skinnable UI controls. It aims for buttery smooth performance based on the philosophy that cross-platform UI kits shouldn't sacrifice one of the most important benefits of native development. ...
Headless UIIt is a set of completely unstyled, fully accessible UI components, designed to integrate beautifully with Tailwind CSS. ...
Tailwind UI alternatives & related posts
Material-UI
- React141
- Material Design82
- Ui components60
- CSS framework30
- Component25
- Looks great14
- Responsive12
- Good documentation12
- LESS9
- Ui component8
- Open source7
- Code examples6
- Flexible6
- JSS5
- Angular3
- Very accessible3
- Fun3
- Supports old browsers out of the box3
- Typescript support2
- # of components2
- Interface2
- Designed for Server Side Rendering2
- Support for multiple styling systems1
- Css1
- Easy to work with1
- Accessibility1
- Hard to learn. Bad documentation35
- Hard to customize28
- Hard to understand Docs21
- Bad performance8
- Extra library needed for date/time pickers7
- For editable table component need to use material-table7
- Typescript Support2
- # of components1
related Material-UI posts
I picked up an idea to develop and it was no brainer I had to go with React for the frontend. I was faced with challenges when it came to what component framework to use. I had worked extensively with Material-UI but I needed something different that would offer me wider range of well customized components (I became pretty slow at styling). I brought in Evergreen after several sampling and reads online but again, after several prototype development against Evergreen—since I was using TypeScript and I had to import custom Type, it felt exhaustive. After I validated Evergreen with the designs of the idea I was developing, I also noticed I might have to do a lot of styling. I later stumbled on Material Kit, the one specifically made for React . It was promising with beautifully crafted components, most of which fits into the designs pages I had on ground.
A major problem of Material Kit for me is it isn't written in TypeScript and there isn't any plans to support its TypeScript version. I rolled up my sleeve and started converting their components to TypeScript and if you'll ask me, I am still on it.
In summary, I used the Create React App with TypeScript support and I am spending some time converting Material Kit to TypeScript before I start developing against it. All of these components are going to be hosted on Bit.
If you feel I am crazy or I have gotten something wrong, I'll be willing to listen to your opinion. Also, if you want to have a share of whatever TypeScript version of Material Kit I end up coming up with, let me know.
My React website is a simple 5-pager that attaches to a database to store and display registrations and other data. The user (small user base) can change any form elements, but I don't need theme-ing, though that would be fun for the user. reactstrap/react-bootstrap built on Bootstrap 4 sounds dated. I am familiar with reactstrap, but a friend said to try Material-UI. The thought of learning it is interesting, but somehow I think it might be overkill. So... reactstrap, react-bootstrap, or Material UI, which should I use?
- Ui Components2
- Icons2
- Looks Amazing1
related Ionicons posts
- Lots of components47
- Polished and enterprisey look and feel33
- TypeScript21
- Easy to integrate20
- Es6 support18
- Typescript support17
- Beautiful and solid17
- Beautifully Animated Components16
- Quick Release rhythm15
- Great documentation14
- Easy to customize Forms2
- Opensource and free of cost1
- Less24
- Large File Size10
- Poor accessibility support4
- Dangerous to use as a base in component libraries3
related Ant Design posts
Hi there!
I just want to have a simple poll/vote...
If you guys need a UI/Component Library for React, Vue.js, or AngularJS, which type of library would you prefer between:
1 ) A single maintained cross-framework library that is 100% compatible and can be integrated with any popular framework like Vue, React, Angular 2, Svelte, etc.
2) A native framework-specific library developed to work only on target framework like ElementUI for Vue, Ant Design for React.
Your advice would help a lot! Thanks in advance :)
Hello, A question to frontend developers. I am a beginner on frontend.
I am building a UI for my company to replace old legacy one with React and this question is about choosing how to apply design to it.
I have Tailwind CSS on one hand and Ant Design on the other (I didnt like mui and Bootstrap doesn't seem to have enterprise components as ant) As far as I understand, tailwind is great. It allows me to literally build an application without touching the css but I have to build my own react components with it. Ant design or mantine has ready to use components which I can use and rapidly build my application.
My question is, is it the right approach to: - Use a component framework for now and replace legacy app. - Introduce tailwind later when I have a frontend resource in hand and then build own component library
Thank you.
- Typescript Support7
- Accessibility4
- Responsiveness4
- Good documentation3
- Hard to customise2
- Styling system1
- # of components1
- Inflexible token structure1
related Chakra UI posts
- Large transfer size4
- Customisation1
related DevExtreme posts
- Avaliable for other frontend frameworks too8
related ElementUI posts
Hi there!
I just want to have a simple poll/vote...
If you guys need a UI/Component Library for React, Vue.js, or AngularJS, which type of library would you prefer between:
1 ) A single maintained cross-framework library that is 100% compatible and can be integrated with any popular framework like Vue, React, Angular 2, Svelte, etc.
2) A native framework-specific library developed to work only on target framework like ElementUI for Vue, Ant Design for React.
Your advice would help a lot! Thanks in advance :)
related Feathers posts