Alternatives to Testery logo

Alternatives to Testery

JUnit, Cucumber, Mockito, PHPUnit, and RSpec are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Testery.
0
2
+ 1
0

What is Testery and what are its top alternatives?

A cloud-based continuous testing platform that automatically runs your tests fast and at scale without requiring you to provision or manage servers.
Testery is a tool in the Testing Frameworks category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Testery

  • JUnit

    JUnit

    JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks. ...

  • Cucumber

    Cucumber

    Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs. ...

  • Mockito

    Mockito

    It is a mocking framework that tastes really good. It lets you write beautiful tests with a clean & simple API. It doesn鈥檛 give you hangover because the tests are very readable and they produce clean verification errors. ...

  • PHPUnit

    PHPUnit

    PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks. ...

  • RSpec

    RSpec

    Behaviour Driven Development for Ruby. Making TDD Productive and Fun.

  • pytest

    pytest

    A framework makes it easy to write small tests, yet scales to support complex functional testing for applications and libraries. It is a mature full-featured Python testing tool. ...

  • xUnit

    xUnit

    It is a free, open source, community-focused unit testing tool for the .NET Framework. It is the latest technology for unit testing C#, F#, VB.NET and other .NET languages. It works with ReSharper, CodeRush, TestDriven.NET and Xamarin. ...

  • Capybara

    Capybara

    Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem. ...

Testery alternatives & related posts

JUnit logo

JUnit

1.2K
435
0
A programmer-oriented testing framework for Java
1.2K
435
+ 1
0
PROS OF JUNIT
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF JUNIT
      Be the first to leave a con

      related JUnit posts

      We are looking for a Testing Tool that can integrate with Java/ React/ Go/ Python/ Node.js. Which amongst the three tools JUnit, NUnit & Selenium would be the best for this use case?

      See more
      Joshua Dean K眉pper
      CEO at Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschr盲nkt) | 1 upvote 路 124.5K views

      We use JUnit for our Java Unit and Integration tests in Version 5. Combined with @JMockit2 and @truth (from Google) we perform all kinds of tests on our minecraft, standalone and microservice architecture.

      We prefer JUnit over TestNG because of the bigger community, better support and the generally more agile development. JUnit integrates nicely with most software, while TestNG support is a little more limited.

      See more
      Cucumber logo

      Cucumber

      695
      644
      24
      Simple, human collaboration.
      695
      644
      + 1
      24
      PROS OF CUCUMBER
      • 17
        Simple Syntax
      • 3
        Simple usage
      • 2
        Nice report
      • 2
        Huge community
      CONS OF CUCUMBER
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Cucumber posts

        Benjamin Poon
        QA Manager - Engineering at HBC Digital | 8 upvotes 路 686.7K views

        For our digital QA organization to support a complex hybrid monolith/microservice architecture, our team took on the lofty goal of building out a commonized UI test automation framework. One of the primary requisites included a technical minimalist threshold such that an engineer or analyst with fundamental knowledge of JavaScript could automate their tests with greater ease. Just to list a few: - Nightwatchjs - Selenium - Cucumber - GitHub - Go.CD - Docker - ExpressJS - React - PostgreSQL

        With this structure, we're able to combine the automation efforts of each team member into a centralized repository while also providing new relevant metrics to business owners.

        See more
        Sarah Elson
        Product Growth at LambdaTest | 4 upvotes 路 290.9K views

        @producthunt LambdaTest Selenium JavaScript Java Python PHP Cucumber TeamCity CircleCI With this new release of LambdaTest automation, you can run tests across an Online Selenium Grid of 2000+ browsers and OS combinations to perform cross browser testing. This saves you from the pain of maintaining the infrastructure and also saves you the licensing costs for browsers and operating systems. #testing #Seleniumgrid #Selenium #testautomation #automation #webdriver #producthunt hunted

        See more
        Mockito logo

        Mockito

        504
        111
        0
        Tasty mocking framework for unit tests in Java
        504
        111
        + 1
        0
        PROS OF MOCKITO
          Be the first to leave a pro
          CONS OF MOCKITO
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Mockito posts

            PHPUnit logo

            PHPUnit

            476
            189
            8
            Testing framework for PHP
            476
            189
            + 1
            8
            PROS OF PHPUNIT
            • 2
              TDD Acceptance Testing
            • 2
              TDD Unit Testing
            • 1
              Unit Testing
            • 1
              TDD Unit Testing
            • 1
              The de facto standard for xUnit testing in PHP
            • 1
              TDD Integration Testing
            • 0
              1
            CONS OF PHPUNIT
            • 1
              Mocked services require more effort and understanding

            related PHPUnit posts

            Shared insights
            on
            Behat
            PHPUnit

            What is the best solution (PHPUnit or Behat) for test automation (unit and functional tests)?

            See more
            RSpec logo

            RSpec

            465
            153
            0
            Behaviour Driven Development for Ruby
            465
            153
            + 1
            0
            PROS OF RSPEC
              Be the first to leave a pro
              CONS OF RSPEC
                Be the first to leave a con

                related RSpec posts

                I'm working as one of the engineering leads in RunaHR. As our platform is a Saas, we thought It'd be good to have an API (We chose Ruby and Rails for this) and a SPA (built with React and Redux ) connected. We started the SPA with Create React App since It's pretty easy to start.

                We use Jest as the testing framework and react-testing-library to test React components. In Rails we make tests using RSpec.

                Our main database is PostgreSQL, but we also use MongoDB to store some type of data. We started to use Redis 聽for cache and other time sensitive operations.

                We have a couple of extra projects: One is an Employee app built with React Native and the other is an internal back office dashboard built with Next.js for the client and Python in the backend side.

                Since we have different frontend apps we have found useful to have Bit to document visual components and utils in JavaScript.

                See more
                Simon Bettison
                Managing Director at Bettison.org Limited | 7 upvotes 路 285.7K views

                In 2010 we made the very difficult decision to entirely re-engineer our existing monolithic LAMP application from the ground up in order to address some growing concerns about it's long term viability as a platform.

                Full application re-write is almost always never the answer, because of the risks involved. However the situation warranted drastic action as it was clear that the existing product was going to face severe scaling issues. We felt it better address these sooner rather than later and also take the opportunity to improve the international architecture and also to refactor the database in. order that it better matched the changes in core functionality.

                PostgreSQL was chosen for its reputation as being solid ACID compliant database backend, it was available as an offering AWS RDS service which reduced the management overhead of us having to configure it ourselves. In order to reduce read load on the primary database we implemented an Elasticsearch layer for fast and scalable search operations. Synchronisation of these indexes was to be achieved through the use of Sidekiq's Redis based background workers on Amazon ElastiCache. Again the AWS solution here looked to be an easy way to keep our involvement in managing this part of the platform at a minimum. Allowing us to focus on our core business.

                Rails ls was chosen for its ability to quickly get core functionality up and running, its MVC architecture and also its focus on Test Driven Development using RSpec and Selenium with Travis CI providing continual integration. We also liked Ruby for its terse, clean and elegant syntax. Though YMMV on that one!

                Unicorn was chosen for its continual deployment and reputation as a reliable application server, nginx for its reputation as a fast and stable reverse-proxy. We also took advantage of the Amazon CloudFront CDN here to further improve performance by caching static assets globally.

                We tried to strike a balance between having control over management and configuration of our core application with the convenience of being able to leverage AWS hosted services for ancillary functions (Amazon SES , Amazon SQS Amazon Route 53 all hosted securely inside Amazon VPC of course!).

                Whilst there is some compromise here with potential vendor lock in, the tasks being performed by these ancillary services are no particularly specialised which should mitigate this risk. Furthermore we have already containerised the stack in our development using Docker environment, and looking to how best to bring this into production - potentially using Amazon EC2 Container Service

                See more
                pytest logo

                pytest

                342
                176
                0
                A full-featured Python testing tool to help you write better programs
                342
                176
                + 1
                0
                PROS OF PYTEST
                  Be the first to leave a pro
                  CONS OF PYTEST
                    Be the first to leave a con

                    related pytest posts

                    xUnit logo

                    xUnit

                    301
                    78
                    0
                    An open source, community-focused unit testing tool
                    301
                    78
                    + 1
                    0
                    PROS OF XUNIT
                      Be the first to leave a pro
                      CONS OF XUNIT
                        Be the first to leave a con

                        related xUnit posts

                        Capybara logo

                        Capybara

                        259
                        159
                        15
                        Acceptance test framework for web applications
                        259
                        159
                        + 1
                        15
                        PROS OF CAPYBARA
                        • 12
                          Best acceptance test framework for Ruby on Rails apps
                        • 2
                          Synchronous with Rack::Test
                        • 1
                          Fast with Rack::Test
                        CONS OF CAPYBARA
                        • 1
                          Hard to make reproducible tests when using with browser

                        related Capybara posts