StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. TestingBot vs Usetrace

TestingBot vs Usetrace

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TestingBot
TestingBot
Stacks10
Followers39
Votes23
Usetrace
Usetrace
Stacks2
Followers5
Votes0

TestingBot vs Usetrace: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key differences between TestingBot and Usetrace:

1. **Automated Testing Capabilities**: TestingBot primarily focuses on providing a cloud-based platform for running automated and manual tests on different browsers and devices, while Usetrace is more centered around end-to-end testing automation with features like UI testing and automated interactions.
2. **Integrations**: TestingBot offers integrations with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins and Bamboo, making it easier to incorporate testing into the continuous integration workflow, whereas Usetrace is known for its seamless integration with project management tools like Jira for efficient test management.
3. **Supported Technologies**: TestingBot supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks for writing automated tests, including Selenium and Appium for web and mobile testing, whereas Usetrace uses a scriptless testing approach that allows testers to create and execute tests without writing code.
4. **Scalability**: TestingBot offers scalable testing infrastructure that can accommodate large test suites and parallel executions, enabling faster testing cycles for teams working on complex applications, in contrast, Usetrace is designed to be more lightweight and suitable for smaller teams with simpler testing needs.
5. **Reporting and Analytics**: TestingBot provides detailed test reports and analytics to help users identify issues and track testing progress effectively, while Usetrace offers in-depth visual test logs and performance metrics for a more comprehensive understanding of test results.
6. **Security Features**: TestingBot emphasizes on ensuring secure testing environments with features like encrypted connections and secure tunnels for testing on internal servers, while Usetrace focuses on data protection and GDPR compliance to safeguard sensitive information during the testing process.

In Summary, TestingBot and Usetrace differ in their automated testing capabilities, integrations, supported technologies, scalability, reporting and analytics, and security features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TestingBot
TestingBot
Usetrace
Usetrace

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Show Usetrace's artificial user how to test your web app - and she'll handle your repetitive UI testing. Usetrace doesn't require coding, and reusable modules make tests quick to create and maintain. Save your time for development while knowing that your app works after each update.

TestingBot provides an easy service to test your website in different browsers and mobile devices.;Run automated tests on multiple browsers and operating systems, or test yourself by controlling any browser in our cloud straight from your computer.
No setup needed. Start immediately in your browser; Modular parametrizable use cases; Get reports directly in your team chat; Test that users can receive and open emails from your webapp; Test with Google Chrome, Firefox and IE 9-11; Test responsive design with different screen sizes
Statistics
Stacks
10
Stacks
2
Followers
39
Followers
5
Votes
23
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Good price
  • 3
    Real Devices
  • 2
    Jenkins integration
  • 2
    Selenium-compatible
  • 2
    Mobile support
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to TestingBot, Usetrace?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana